N. KOTISWAR SINGH
Babu Ram – Appellant
Versus
Tata Project Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present application has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the ‘Act of 1996’) for appointment of an arbitrator to settle the dispute between the petitioner and the respondents.
2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the respondent No. l (Tata Project Ltd. Company) was allotted a work for the construction of a transmission line by the respondents no. 2 to 4 (Power Grid Corporation of India). Thereafter, the respondent no. 1 executed a subcontract in favour of the petitioner for the construction of revetment work LOC No. 167 and 168 vide work order No. 14998 dated 26.10.2017 for an amount of Rs. 24,72,750/- (Rupees twenty-four lacs seventy-two thousand seven hundred and fifty only).
3. According to the petitioner, the petitioner duly executed and completed the said contract to the satisfaction of the respondents. Thereafter, the transmission tower was also erected over the said revetment and now the said transmission line has been commissionedand is functioning.
4. The petitioner contends that after completing the work the petitioner submitted his bills amounting to Rs. 24,72,750/- (Rupees twenty-four lacs seve
Balco vs. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc. (2012) 9 SCC 552 : (2012) 4 SCC (Civ) 810
Brahmani River Pellets Ltd. vs. Kamachi Industries Ltd. (2020) 5 SCC 462 : 2019 SCC Online SC 929
Essar Oil Ltd. vs. Hindustan Shipyard Ltd. (2015) 10 SCC 642
Gases (P) Ltd. vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (2013) 9 SCC 32 : (2013) 4 SCC (Civ) 157
Swastik Gases (P) Ltd. vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (2013) 9 SCC 32 : (2013) 4 SCC (Civ) 157
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.