Back
SANJEEV KUMAR
Bashir Ahmed Sheikh – Appellant
Versus
Mohd Yousuf Mir S/o Naba Mir – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJEEV KUMAR, J.
1. This Civil Second Appeal by the appellants [‘the plaintiffs in the suit before the trial Court’] is directed against a judgment and decree dated 25.05.2006 passed by the Court of learned District Judge, Anantnag [‘the 1st Appellate Court’] in File No. 12 (Appeal) titled Bashir Ahmad Sheikh and Others vs. Mohd. Yousuf Mir and Others, whereby the 1st Appellate Court has upheld the judgment and decree dated 21.08.2002 passed by the Court of learned Munsiff, Anantnag [‘the trial Court’] in a Civil Suit (File No. 2009) titled Bashir Ahmad Sheikh and Others vs. Mohd. Yousuf Mir and Others.
2. Instant Civil Second Appeal was admitted on the following questions of law framed by this Court vide order dated 21.02.2008:
(2) Whether finding of first Appellate Court that the prayer sought by the plaintiff in the suit is hit by limitation was proper even while the trial Court had neither heard, nor discussed the question of limitation?
3. The aforesaid questions have arisen in the backdrop of following factual matrix:
The possession of the plaintiffs' predecessor-in-interest should be considered as the possession of the plaintiffs for the purpose of Article 142 of the Limitation Act, and the sale of immovable prop....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the respondents' claim of possession and tenancy was contradictory and not supported by evidence, and that the decree obtained by the first re....
The suit for possession based on title is governed by Article 65 of the Limitation Act, allowing 12 years from the date of adverse possession, not Article 58.
Ownership and possession must be substantiated by evidence, and the defense of possession through a sale agreement requires proof of readiness to perform contract obligations; otherwise, it does not ....
In property disputes, once a plaintiff proves title, the burden shifts to the defendant to establish adverse possession; failure to do so results in the plaintiff's claim being upheld.
The court emphasized the importance of proving ownership, adhering to limitation periods, and joining necessary parties in civil suits.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
