Back
RAJNESH OSWAL, RAHUL BHARTI
Indira Gandhi National Open University – Appellant
Versus
Bashir Ahmad Sofi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing and review of the case's procedural history. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background leading to writ petition establishment. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. clarification between regular appointments and contract employment. (Para 40 , 42 , 44 , 46) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the writ pleadings and the documents therewith and also the present letters patent appeal.
2. A short judgment of the learned Single Bench in the writ petition has engaged the Division Bench in a letters patent appeal for long to face the final curtain on the matter in issue.
3. The respondents No. 1 to 12 joined together to be the writ petitioners to file a writ petition No. SWP 1429/2009 on 09/10/2009 before the writ court against the appellants No. 1 to 5 herein who figured as the respondents No. 2 to 6 in the said writ petition. The pro forma respondent Union of India, UOI herein, figured as the respondent No. 1 in the writ petition.
4. The appellant No. 1 is Indira Gandhi National Open University (‘IGNOU’ in short), the appellant No. 2 is the Registrar Administration IGNOU, the appellant No. 3 is the Director, Regional Services Division IGNOU, the appellant
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
