Back
K. LAKSHMAN, K. SUJANA
Gummadadala Venkataramaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K. Lakshman, J.
Heard Sri M.S Prasad, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr.Srikanth Ch, learned Counsel for the appellants, Sri M.V. Rama Rao, learned Special Government Pleader for Services and Sri C. Haripreet, learned counsel appearing for the un-official respondents.
2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order dated 17.10.2022 passed in W.P.No.13137 of 2022 by the learned Single Judge, the unsuccessful writ petitioners preferred the present intracourt appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent.
3. The appellants have filed I.A.No.4 2022 to amend the cause title to the extent of 2nd respondent as ‘Telangana State Remote Sensing Application Centre (TRAC) represented by its Director General & Chairman, Secretariat, Hyderabad’ instead of ‘The Director General & Chairman, Telangana State Remote Sensing Application Centre (TRAC)’.
4. Having satisfied with the reasons and also considering the fact that it is a typographical mistake, the said application is allowed permitting the appellants herein to amend the cause title to the extent of 2nd respondent as ‘Telangana State Remote Sensing Application Centre (TRAC) represented by its Director General and Chairman, Secretar
Contractual employees cannot claim regularization as a matter of right; their employment is project-based and temporary, governed by specific contractual terms.
Point of law: Service Law - Contractual employment - Regularization of Service - Having applied for appointment to various posts pursuant to a notification of 2019 and being unsuccessful (except one ....
The court emphasizes that regularization of temporary employees must adhere to principles of equality and fairness, ensuring parity in treatment for similarly situated employees.
Contractual employees may not claim regularization based on prolonged service or failed applications for higher posts, as employment must adhere to constitutional recruitment mandates.
Temporary or casual employment does not confer legal rights to regularization; adherence to proper recruitment processes is mandatory for permanent appointments.
In order that a mandamus may issue to compel the authorities to do something, it must be shown that the statute imposes a legal duty on the authority and the aggrieved party had a legal right under t....
Regularization of services for employees who have served for over ten years is a right that must be considered by the state, provided there are no valid objections, and the state must adhere to its o....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
