SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(J&K) 205

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, J.
Qadeer Hussain, S/o. Abdul Rehman - Petitioner
Versus
UT of J&K Through SHO Police Station, Poonch & Ors. - Respondents
WP(Crl) No. 1 of 2024
Decided On : 23-02-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Lawanya Sharma.
For the Respondent:Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.

The central legal point established in the judgment is that the forfeiture of property should be done in accordance with the relevant statutory provisions, and the court must have due regard to the entitlement claimed by the person seeking possession of the property.

Headnote:

Forfeiture - Vehicle Ownership - Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Code of Criminal Procedure - Rule 8 of Notification Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Care and Maintenance of Case Property Animals) Rules 2017

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner seeks relief from the quashment of orders forfeiting their vehicle to SPCA, Poonch, based on an FIR and subsequent trial resulting in the forfeiture order.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the forfeiture of the vehicle based on Rule 8 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act was legally flawed and ordered the case to be remanded back to the Chief Judicial Magistrate for re-examination.

Issues: The issues revolved around the legality of the forfeiture of the vehicle based on Rule 8 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and the application of Section 452 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the forfeiture of the vehicle based on Rule 8 was legally flawed and that Section 452 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should have been applied for the disposal of the property at the conclusion of the trial.

Final Decision: The court quashed the orders of forfeiture and remanded the case back to the Chief Judicial Magistrate for re-examination in accordance with Rule 8 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Care and Maintenance of Case Property Animals) Rules 2017 and Section 452 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner through the medium of the present petition is seeking following reliefs:-

    (a) Certiorari, seeking quashment of the order dated 20.07.2023 passed by the Court of Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate in the case titled "UT of J&K through SHO Police Station Loran Vs. Qadeer Hussain and Anr.," File No. 60/Challan having CNR No. JKPN030008182023 to the extent that the vehicle of the petitioner bearing Registration No. JK12 5099 (Tata Goods Carrier) has been ordered to be forfeited to SPCA (Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals), Poonch in complete violation of principle of Natural Justice and Code of Criminal Procedure;

(b) Certiorari, seeking quashment of the order dated 02.11.2023 passed by the Court of Learned Principal Session Judge, Poonch in the case titled "Qadeer Hussain Vs. UT of J&K through SHO Police Station Poonch," bearing File No. 10/Criminal appeal having CNR No. JKPN010003092023 to the extent whereby the appeal against the impugned order dated 20.07.2023 passed by the Court of Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Poonch in the case titled "UT of J&K through SHO Police Station Loran Vs. Qadeer Hussain and Anr.," under File No. 60/Challan having CNR No. JKPN030008182023 was dismissed being illegal arbitrary and against the statutory provisions of law;

(c) Mandamus, seeking directions to the respondents to release the vehicle bearing Registration No. JK12 5099 (Tata Goods Carrier) seized in case titled “UT of J&K through SHO Police Station Loran Vs. Qadeer Hussain and Anr.," pending before the Court of Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate arising out of F.I.R bearing No. 0013/2023 registered with Police Station Loran which was ordered to be forfeited to SPCA (Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals), Poonch vide impugned orders dated 20.07.2023 and 02.11.2023 (Supra);

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE:

2. The petitioner is claiming to be the lawful and absolute owner of the vehicle bearing Registration No. JK12 5099 (Tata Goods Carrier) and possesses all legal documents and titles establishing unchallenged ownership rights over the aforementioned vehicle as alleged by him.

3. The petitioner challenges the order dated 20.07.2023 passed by the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Poonch in the case titled UT of J&K through SHO Police Station, Loran Vs. Qadeer Hussain and Another by virtue of which the vehicle bearing Registration No. JK12 5099 has been ordered to be forfeited to SPCA (Care and Maintenance of Case Property Animals) under Rule 8 of Notification Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Care and Maintenance of Case Property Animals) Rules 2017. The petitioner is also seeking quashment of the order dated 02.11.2023 passed by the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Poonch in case titled Qadeer Hussain Vs. UT of J&K through Police Station, Poonch in file No. 10/Criminal Appeal, whereby, Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Poonch has dismissed the appeal.

4. The case of the petitioner is that an FIR bearing No. 0013/2023 dated 07.07.2023 was lodged against the petitioner and subsequently, a challan was presented before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Poonch, wherein the petitioner pleaded guilty to allegations constituting offences under Section 188 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

5. Further case of the petitioner is that the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Poonch while awarding punishment to the petitioners and concluding the trial, directed the forfeiture of the aforesaid vehicle owned by the petitioner to the SPCA, Poonch under Rule 8 of Notification Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Care and Maintenance of Case Property Animals) Rules 2017 and as per Rule 8, if the accused person is convicted, or pleads guilty, the Magistrate shall deprive him of the ownership of animals and forfeit the seized animals to the infirmary Pinjrapole, SPCA Animal Welfare Organization or Gaushala already having custody for proper adoption or other dispos

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top