SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(J&K) 51

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
RAJNESH OSWAL, J.
 
Hakim Din - Appellant
Vs.
U. T of J&K and others - Respondent
Bail App No. 270 OF 2024 c/w CRM(M) No. 856 OF 2024
Decided On : 20-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Yasser Sultan Shan, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Eishan Dadhichi, GA

The court upheld the FIR against the petitioner for forgery, emphasizing that evidence collected during the investigation justified the charges and the FIR could not be quashed.

Headnote:

(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 420, 465, and 468 - Quashing of FIR - Petitioner challenged FIR for alleged forgery related to school records for promotion - The court found sufficient evidence of forgery and upheld the FIR - The petitioner’s claims regarding the genuineness of documents were dismissed as misconceived. (Paras 1, 8, 9)

(B) Judicial Review - The court emphasized that the FIR cannot be quashed at this stage given the evidence collected during the investigation, and the petitioner must cooperate with the Investigating Agency. (Paras 6, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, appointed as SPO in 2014, faced issues with the verification of school records for promotion to Constable. Allegations arose regarding the authenticity of his School Leaving Certificate, which was found to be forged. (Paras 1, 2, 3)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the FIR was justified based on the evidence of forgery presented by the Investigating Officer, and the petitioner’s claims were not credible. (Paras 8, 9)

Issues: The main issues included the authenticity of the School Leaving Certificate and whether the FIR could be quashed based on the petitioner’s claims. (Paras 1, 8)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the evidence collected during the investigation warranted the continuation of the FIR, and the petitioner’s claims of innocence were unfounded. (Paras 8, 9)

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner challenges fir (Para 1)
2. promotion order not implemented (Para 2)
3. allegations of forgery (Para 3)
4. investigation details (Para 4)
5. petitioner's argument on fir (Para 5)
6. respondents' argument on forgery (Para 6)
7. allegations against petitioner (Para 7 , 8)
8. dismissal of petition (Para 9)

JUDGMENT

CRM(M) No. 856/2024

1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner for the quashingof FIR bearing No. 82/2024 dated 11.11.2024 registered with Police Station, Gool for commission of offences under Sections 420 , 465 and 468 IPC .

2. It is stated that the petitioner was appointed as SPO in the Police Department in the year 2014 and was promoted as Constable vide order dated 14.03.2023 but the said order was not implemented due to the issue of verification of the school records. When the various representations for effecting the order of promotion were not considered by the employer, the petitioner was constrained to file application dated 03.06.2024 before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Jammu against the School Authorities and the Police Department. Directions were sought upon the respondents therein that the petitioner be allowed to join the services as Constable and the promotion order be implemented in its letter and spirit. Learned CAT after hearing the parties vide interim order dated 07.06.2024 directed the respondents therein to allow the applicant/petitioner herein to join at the post of constable provisionally. When the said order was not implemented, the learned Tribunal vide order dated 10.10.2024 directed the personal appearance of the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ramban. It is stated that as far as allegations of the wrong date of birth are concerned, in all the documents of the petitioner like PAN Card, Aadhar Card and the Date of Birth certificate, the date of birth of the petitioner has been mentioned as 01.01.1987, similar to the date depicted in the School Leaving Certificate but the Police has wrongly enquired into the matter and false and frivolous allegations of forgery have been leveled against the petitioner. The petitioner has placed on record the copies of OA preferred before the CAT, PAN card, Aadhar Card and order dated 07.06.2024.

3. The respondents have filed the objections, stating therein that a letter dated 11.11.2024 alongwith enquiry report of In-charge, Police Post, Ind (Gool) was received at Police Station from SDPO Police Station, Gool for registration of FIR. In the enquiry report, it was stated that the In-charge Police Post Ind, (Inquiry Officer) has enquired from the In-charge Headmaster of Government High School, Ind in respect of the school record of the SPO-Hakim Din i.e. the petitioner herein. On enquiry and after checking the school records and as per statement of the said In- charge Headmaster, it has been found that the Date of Birth of Hakim Din is 10.01.1981 and the School Leaving Certificate of 8th Class produced by the said person, namely, Hakim Din i.e. the petitioner herein for recruitment, is not genuine and has not been issued from the Government High School Ind. Even the admission No. 632 which is shown in the School Leaving Certificate did not belong to the petitioner-Hakim Din but belongs to girl child, namely, Meenakshi Sharma as per the school record. It is further stated that the reply provided by the Government High School Ind to SSP Ramban in respect of the genuineness of 9th Class Leaving Certificate, vide No. HIS/2023/01 dated 03.04.2023, the certificate was also got tampered after being issued. The number 9th was changed to 8th after it was issued from the school. After enquiry, FIR No. 82/2024 for commission of offences under sections 420, 465 and 468 IPC was registered with Police Station, Gool.

4. During investigation, the Investigating Officer seized the documents, Enquiry Report, Attendance Register, Result Register, School Leaving Certificate Register and prepared seizure memo and recorded the statements of the wi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top