JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as for the respondents. Perused the pleadings of both sides and also the scanned detention record produced at the end of the respondents.

2. The case in hand is an exhibit of a preventive detention measure under the aegis of J&K Public Safety Act, 1978 being resorted to as a perverted detention by the District Police and District Executive Magistracy as an extra legal expedience not only to curb fundamental right to personal liberty of the petitioner but also a stratagem to outmaneuver the constitutional and criminal courts indulgence in the matter of granting bail in favour of the petitioner thereby to show off that the fiat of Police and dictate Executive outruns the writ and commands of the constitutional and criminal court.

3. The petitioner, acting through his wife, has petitioned this Court invoking writ jurisdiction under article 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking a writ of habeas corpus for the purpose of retrieving and restoring the personal liberty of the petitioner which he has come to lose by virtue of detention order No. PSA-30 of 2024 dated 05.09.2024 passed by the respondent No. 2 – District Magist