SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(J&K) 107

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
M A CHOWDHARY, J.
Mohammad Jamal Sheikh S/O Abdul Gani Sheikh – Appellant 
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir Through Chief Secretary, Civil Secretariat, Jammu/Srinagar – Respondent 
WP(C) No. 336 of 2023
Decided on : 06-03-2025 


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Areeb Javed Kawoosa, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Furkan Yaqub, GA.

The court affirmed that Article 16(4A) applies to Jammu and Kashmir, mandating reservation in promotions for SC/ST categories, and emphasized the need for quantifiable data to justify such reservations.

Headnote:

(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Act, 2004 - Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Rules, 2005 - Petitioners sought to quash Circular No. 10-JK (GAD) of 2021 which directed keeping slots for reserved employees vacant, claiming it violates Articles 14 and 16(4A) - Petitioners represent engineers from various reserved categories alleging denial of promotion rights - Court found that the impugned Circular was quashed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, and directed the respondents to collect quantifiable data for reservation in promotions and consider the petitioners for promotion accordingly. (Paras 1-28)

(B) Reservation in Promotions - The court emphasized the necessity of collecting quantifiable data to justify reservation in promotions for SC/ST categories, as per the Supreme Court's directives in M. Nagaraj and Jarnail Singh cases. (Paras 20-27)

(C) Constitutional Validity - The court reaffirmed that Article 16(4A) applies to the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, mandating the provision of reservation in promotions. (Paras 12-19)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, representing engineers from reserved categories, challenged a government circular that prevented filling reserved slots for promotions, claiming it violated their constitutional rights.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the respondents to collect quantifiable data for SC/ST promotions and consider the petitioners for promotion against reserved slots.

Issues: The main issues were the validity of the impugned Circular and the obligation to provide reservation in promotions under the Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the impugned Circular was unconstitutional as it disregarded the application of Article 16(4A) in Jammu and Kashmir, and emphasized the need for quantifiable data to support reservation claims.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions to consider petitioners for promotions.

JUDGMENT :

01. Through the medium of the instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:

(i) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction including one in the nature of Certiorari for quashment of impugned Circular No. 10-JK (GAD) of 2021 dated 05.03.2021 issued by the Respondent No. 3 whereby all the administrative secretaries have been asked to keep the slots meant for reserved employees vacant/unfilled, the same being ultravires to Articles 14 and 16(4A) of the Constitution of India

(ii) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction including one in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to promote the petitioners as well as other reserved category employees of the UT of J&K to their respective next higher posts on their roster slots under their respective Reserved Categories strictly in terms of J&K Reservation Act, 2004 and J&K Reservation Rules, 2005.

(iii) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction including one in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the petitioners as well as other reserved category candidates of the UT of J&K on the roster slots under their respective categories strictly in terms of J&K Reservation Act, 2004 and J&K Reservation Rules, 2005.

02. The petitioners, who have been permitted to file this petition in a representative capacity vide interim order dated 31.10.2024, filed this petition claiming that they represent the Engineers serving in J&K Power Transmission Corporation Limited, Jammu Power Distribution Corporation Limited and Kashmir Power Distribution Corporation Limited, belonging to various reserved categories like Scheduled Casts (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), Residents of Backward Area (RBA), Actual Line of Control (ALC) and Other Social Castes (OSCs), alleging therein that they have been denied reservation in promotions to which they are entitled to in terms of Article 16(4A) of the Constitution of India in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, due to Circular No. 10-JK (GAD) of 2021 dated 05.03.2021 issued by the respondent No. 3, which has been impugned in this petition, whereby all the Administrative Secretaries have been asked to keep the slots meant for reserved employees vacant/unfilled.

03. It has been alleged in the petition that the respondents have been deliberately not granting reservation in promotions to the members of the petitioners‟ Association, who are entitled to be considered for promotion not only in terms of Article 16(4A) of the Constitution of India but in terms of Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Act, 2004 as well as Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Rules, 2005.

04. It has also been pleaded that despite making provision for reservation in promotions in Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Act, 2004 and Rules framed thereunder, to provide 8% reservation in promotions for the candidates belonging to Scheduled Caste category whereas 10% reservation was provided to the Scheduled Tribes category with fixation of rosters as well and finally it was prayed that the impugned Circular, whereby all the Administrative Secretaries have been asked to keep the slots meant for reserved employees vacant/unfilled, be quashed directing the respondents to promote the petitioners as well as other reserved category employees of the UT of Jammu and Kashmir to their respective categories strictly in terms of Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Act, 2004 and Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Rules, 2005 under the roster slots.

05. Learned counsel for the petitioners‟ Association in line with the pleadings made in the petition has argued that the officers/officials of the reserved categories of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Residents of Backward Areas despite a provision for their consideration for reservation in promotions, in terms of the of Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Act, 2004 read with Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Rules, 2005, have been denied reservation in promotions for th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top