SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(JK) 455

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, J
IQRA JAN AND ANR. – Appellant
Versus
UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR (HOME) AND ORS. – Respondent
WP(C) 1971 / 2024



Advocates:
Mr. Bhat Khursheed, Advocate; Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy.AG.

Individuals of majority age have the right to marry freely, and authorities must protect them from familial threats and harassment.

Headnote:

(A) Constitution of India - Article 144 - Inter-caste and inter-religious marriage - Petitioners, both of age of majority, entered into marriage out of free will, facing threats from family members - Supreme Court's directive in Lata Singh vs. State of UP mandates protection for such individuals from harassment and violence - Police authorities are directed to ensure safety of petitioners. (Paras 1-3)

(B) Marriage - Free will - The court recognizes the right of individuals to marry of their own volition, emphasizing the need for protection against familial and societal pressures. (Paras 1-2)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, having solemnized their marriage on 29.08.2024, are in hiding due to threats from the father of petitioner No. 1, who disapproves of their union. They provided evidence of their marriage and age to support their claim.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police to ensure the petitioners are not subjected to harassment or intimidation and that no arrests are made based on any FIR filed by the father against them.

Issues: The main issues addressed were the protection of the petitioners' rights to marry freely and the obligation of law enforcement to safeguard them from threats.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed the constitutional mandate for authorities to protect the rights of individuals in inter-caste or inter-religious marriages, emphasizing that threats or harassment must be addressed by law enforcement.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions to police authorities.

ORDER :

1. The petitioners, both being of the age of majority, have exercised their free will to enter into marital relationship and for that have earned displeasure of their respective families. To lend confirmation to the fact of their marriage having been solemnized out of their free will and volition, the petitioners have put on record a copy of marriage agreement dated 29.08.2024. Along with the writ petition, the petitioner no. 1’s Aadhar Card evidencing her date of birth is also annexed which confirms the fact that the petitioner no. 1 is and was major at the time of solemnizing marriage with the petitioner no. 2.

2. The petitioners are in hiding fearing about safety and security of their life and limb suffering wrong at the hands of respondent No.5, who is the father of petitioner No.1, is carrying hard feelings against the petitioners for their act of marrying each other.

3. Keeping in view the mandate and dictate of the Hon’ble Supreme Court as laid down in case of Lata Singh vs. State of UP and anr, 2006 (5) SCC 475 in terms whereof a direction has been set into effect for the Govt. Administration and Police Authorities throughout the Country to see to it that if any boy or girl who is a major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a girl or boy who is also major, then the marrying individuals are not to be harassed by any one nor to be subjected to threats or acts of violence, and in case any such threat or harassment is confronted to be inflicted on the individuals then the persons responsible for holding out such threats/harassments are to be taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the Police against such persons and further stern action to be taken as provided by law.

4. Article 144 of the Constitution of India mandates all Authorities, Civil and Judicial, in the territory of India to act in aid of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Bearing this constitutional sanction in perspective and the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court set into place, it is a matter of duty for the Police Officials as well as officials of the concerned Civil Administration, irrespective of hierarchical position, to ensure that marrying individuals who are major and have chosen to become husband and wife out of their free will and volition are not to fear anybody causing any harm to their life and limb.

5. This petition at the threshold is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 - Senior Superintendent of Police, Baramulla to ensure by issuing appropriate directions to the respondent no. 3 and 4 -Station House Iqra Jan and Irshad Ahmad Bhat are not subjected to any harassment/intimidation/threats at the hands of the respondent No. 5 or any other person. Furthermore, in case the Police Station, Tarzoo Sopore and Police Station, Sopore have registered any FIR at the instance of the respondent No.5 against the petitioners or either of the two petitioners then also no arrest of the petitioners shall be carried out by the said Police Station.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top