IN THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT
RAHUL BHARTI, J.
Bilal Feroz Dass S/o Feroz Ahmad Dass - Petitioner
Vs.
UT of JK through Commissioner cum Secretary to Government Home Department Civil Secretariat Srinagar/Jammu - Respondent
WP (C) No. 3335 OF 2025 CM No. 774 OF 2025
Decided On :
(A) Constitution of India - Article 144 - Inter-caste and inter-religious marriage - Petitioners, both of age of majority, entered into marriage out of free will, facing threats from families - Supreme Court directive in Lata Singh case mandates protection for marrying individuals against harassment - Police must ensure safety of petitioners. (Paras 5, 6, 7)
(B) Marriage - Validity and recognition of marriage performed out of free will - Petitioners provided evidence of marriage agreement and age confirmation through Aadhar cards. (Paras 2, 3, 4)
Facts of the case:
Petitioners, fearing for their safety due to family opposition, sought protection after marrying each other as per Muslim rites. They provided a marriage agreement and Aadhar cards confirming their age.
Findings of Court:
The court directed police authorities to ensure the petitioners are not harassed and that any FIRs against them do not lead to arrest.
Issues: The main issues were the protection of individuals in inter-caste or inter-religious marriages and the enforcement of Supreme Court directives regarding their safety.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the constitutional duty of police and civil authorities to protect the rights of individuals who marry out of free will, as mandated by the Supreme Court.
Result: Petition disposed of with directions for police protection.
ORDER :
1. The petitioners, both being of the age of majority, have exercised their free will to enter into marital relationship and for that have earned displeasure of their respective families.
2. To lend confirmation to the fact of solemnization of their marriage as per Muslim rite and rituals having been performed out of their free will and volition, the petitioners have put on record a copy of marriage agreement dated 05.02.2025.
3. Along with the writ petition, the petitioners aadhar cards evidencing their date of birth are also annexed which confirms the fact that the petitioners are and were major at the time of solemnizing marriage and are well versed with their well being and welfare.
4. The petitioners are in hiding fearing about safety and security of their life and limb suffering wrong at the hands of their parental side relatives, who are carrying hard feelings against the petitioners for their act of marrying each other against family will and dictate.
5. Keeping in view the mandate and dictate of the Hon'ble Supreme Court as laid down in case of Lata Singh vs. State of UP and Anr, 2006 (5) SCC 475 in terms whereof a direction Arif Hameed has been set into effect for the Govt. Administration and Police Authorities throughout the Country to see to it that if any boy or girl who is a major undergoes inter-caste or inter- religious marriage with a girl or boy who is also major, then the marrying individuals are not to be harassed by any one nor to be subjected to threats or acts of violence, and in case any such threat or harassment is confronted to be inflicted on the individuals then the persons responsible for holding out such threats/harassments are to be taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the Police against such persons and further stern action to be taken as provided by law.
6. Article 144 of the Constitution of India mandates all Authorities, Civil and Judicial, in the territory of India to act in aid of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Bearing this constitutional sanction in perspective and the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court set into place, it is a matter of duty for the Police Officials as well as officials of the concerned Civil Administration, irrespective of hierarchical position, to ensure that marrying individuals who are major and have chosen to become husband and wife out of their free will and volition are not to fear anybody causing any harm to their life and limb.
7. This petition, at the threshold, is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 5-Senior Superintendent of Police, Arif Hameed Baramulla and respondent No. 11-Senior Superintendent of Police, Anantnag to ensure by issuing appropriate directions to the Station House Officers of the Police Stations Bijbehara, Kunzer, Tangmarg respectively that the petitioners, namely Bilal Feroz Dass and Sabreena Akhter are not subjected to any harassment/intimidation/threats at the hands of the private respondents No. 12 to 14 or any other person. Furthermore, in case the Police Station, Bijbehara Anantnag and Police Station Tangmarg Baramulla have registered any FIR at the instance of the private respondents against the petitioners or either of the two petitioners then also no arrest of the petitioners shall be carried out by the said Police Stations.
AI
The court affirmed the constitutional duty of authorities to protect individuals in inter-caste or inter-religious marriages from harassment, as mandated by the Supreme Court.
Individuals of majority age have the right to marry freely, and authorities must protect them from familial threats and harassment.
Authorities must protect individuals in consensual marriages from harassment, as mandated by the Supreme Court.
A person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes. If the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage the maximum they can do is that t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.