HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, J
ABDUL SALAM DAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT) – Respondent
RFA 10 / 2023
(A) Land Acquisition Act - Section 18 - Civil First Appeal against the dismissal of reference petitions as time barred - Appellant contended lack of knowledge regarding the time limit for filing application and absence of proper notice under Section 4(1) - Trial Court found that the appellant was aware of the award and had received compensation under protest - Appeal dismissed. (Paras 4, 10)
(B) Limitation - The court emphasized that the appellant failed to provide sufficient reasons for the delay in filing the application for reference, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. (Paras 10, 11)
Facts of the case:
The appeals arose from the dismissal of reference petitions under the Land Acquisition Act, where the appellant claimed ignorance of the time limit and procedural lapses by the respondents. The land was acquired for the construction of a road, and compensation was received under protest.
Findings of Court:
The court upheld the Trial Court's decision, stating that the appellant was aware of the award and failed to file the application within the stipulated time.
Issues: The main issues included whether the appellant was time-barred in filing the application for reference and whether proper notice was given under the Land Acquisition Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the appellant's knowledge of the award and the lack of cogent reasons for the delay justified the dismissal of the appeal.
Result: Appeals dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. These two appeals have arisen out of common judgement dated 19th September 2022. Let me first take up appeal, being RFA 10/2023.
RFA no.10/2023
2. This Civil First Appeal under Section 52 of the Land Acquisition Act is directed against the Award dated 19th September 2022, passed by Principal District Judge, Anantnag (for short “Trial Court”) on File Nos. 1/Reference and 2/Reference, by which reference petitions made by Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag, under Section 18 have been dismissed on the ground of being time barred and for setting-aside the same.
3. I have heard learned counsel for parties and considered the matter.
4. The grounds of challenge, inter alia, are that impugned award is bad in the eye of law; that Trial Court has not framed any issue regarding claim of appellants being time barred; that at the time of approaching Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag, appellant filed application for condonation of delay; that appellant could not approach Collector within time as he was having no knowledge about Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act; that since no award has been framed in the matter by Collector, as such, appellant could not approach Collector within time but this aspect of the matter has been observed in breach by Trial Court; that due to domestic problems, appellant could not approach Collector within time; that appellant being illiterate was having no knowledge that application had to be filed within six months, but this aspect of the matter has not been taken into consideration by the Trial Court while passing impugned award; that respondents are meant to respect and implement the law and comply with the same and safeguard common law rights and constitutional rights of the person; that no notice under Section 4(1) has been issued by respondents; that there has been no publication through beat of drum or through local panchayat and Patwari; that notice has not been published in any newspaper; that publication through Government Gazette also seems to have been ignored; that no opportunity of being heard has been provided to landholder/appellant in terms of section 5(a) of Land Acquisition Act; that there does not seem to be any report prepared by Collector in terms of Section 5(A) for submission to the Government for taking the decision with regard to acquisition of land; that declaration required to be made under Section 6 and further directions to Collector to take further action has been issued by Financial Commissioner in terms of SRO 177, by which powers have been vested in him to issue declaration under Section 6 and 7 of the Act; that declaration under Section 6 has not been issued by respondents; that Section 17 of Land Acquisition Act provides power to Government to direct Collector in case of urgency to take possession of land needed for public purpose on expiration of 15 days from publication of notice mentioned in Section 9(1) of the Act; that appellants were deprives of right of hearing under Section 5-A without dispensation of such hearing as provided under the last proviso to Section 17 of the Act.
5. From perusal of file, it is evident that land measuring 43 Kanals 08 Marlas came under acquisition for alignment of Anantnag Simthan Kishtwar Road. Notification under Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act was made on 18th July 2005 read with corrigendum dated 24th August 2011, calling objections from interested persons, which, on receipts, were disposed of and the case was recommended for issuance of declaration under Section 6&7 of Land Acquisition Act. Notification under Section 9 and 9A was issued. None are said to have filed objections within stipulated period of time. Private Negotiation Committee (PNC) was held by Deputy Commissioner, Anantnag, on 17th January 2007. Land measuring 02 Kanals 14 Marlas under Sruvey no.477 min belonging to Abdul Salam Dar S/o Ghulam rasool Dar R/o Brakpora, Anantnag, situate at Brakpora, Anantnag, also came under alignment of Anantnag-Simthan Kishtwar
The court affirmed that knowledge of the award and failure to provide valid reasons for delay in filing a reference application under the Land Acquisition Act justified the dismissal of the appeal.
Timely filing of applications under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act is crucial; failure to do so without valid reasons results in dismissal of appeals.
Timely communication of the award's contents is mandatory; failure results in the reinstatement of claims despite delays in processing.
Knowledge of the award is crucial for invoking the statutory provisions for reference under the Land Acquisition Act, and failure to demonstrate lack of knowledge results in dismissal of the applicat....
The limitation period for filing a reference petition under the Land Acquisition Act begins when the landowner has actual knowledge of the award's contents, not merely from the award's passing date.
The limitation period for filing a reference petition under the Land Acquisition Act begins from the date of knowledge of the award's contents, and the burden of proving notice issuance lies with the....
Misleading claims and misrepresentation of facts can disqualify an appellant from maintaining an appeal.
The court established that the time taken to obtain a certified copy of a court award is excluded from the limitation period under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.