ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAJESH BINDAL, CJ., J.J. MUNIR, J.
Kunwar Pal @ Kumar Pal Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. and Others - Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 20901 of 2022
Decided On : 10-08-2022
Land Acquisition - Application Rejection - Section 28A - The court interpreted Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, emphasizing the exclusion of time spent obtaining a certified copy of the award from the limitation period, leading to the restoration of the application.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought redetermination of compensation for land acquired by the State, claiming entitlement based on a prior court award. The application under Section 28A was rejected as time-barred by the Special Land Acquisition Officer.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the time spent obtaining a certified copy of the prior award should be excluded from the limitation period, thus the application was not time-barred and should be restored for consideration.
Issues: Whether the application under Section 28A was time-barred and if the time spent obtaining a certified copy of the award should be excluded from the limitation period.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the exclusion of time for obtaining a certified copy is mandated by the proviso to Section 28A(1), allowing the application to be considered timely.
Result: The impugned order was quashed, and the application under Section 28A was restored for determination.
JUDGMENT :
This writ petition is directed against an order of the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Sanyukt Sangathan), Aligarh dated 30.4.2022 rejecting the petitioner's application under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') as time barred.
2. Heard Mr. K.S. Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rajeev Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Ms. Archi Agarwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 3.
3. The petitioner, Kunwar Pal made an application to the Collector-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Aligarh dated 29.1.2001 saying that his land comprising Khasra No. 7/0-2-0, Khasra No. 10/0-4-0, Khasra No. 27(m)/0-10-0 and Khasra No. 414 (m)/1-14-0 admeasuring a total of 2 Bigha 2 Biswa situate at village Talaspur Kalan, Post Quarsi, Pagrana and Tehsil Koil, District Aligarh was acquired by the State for the purpose of Planned Industrial Development by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Department Corporation, Kanpur. It was the petitioner's case that in LAR No. 70 of 1993, Mahendra Singh and others v. State of U.P. and others, the XIth Additional District Judge, Aligarh while deciding the reference under Section 18 of the Act relating to the same notification 4(1) through which the petitioner's lands were acquired vide his judgment and award dated 25.10.2000 enhanced the compensation to Rs. 50 per square yard together with a proportionate increase in the other statutory entitlements. The petitioner claims that he was entitled to redetermination of the compensation payable to him as originally awarded, in accordance with the award made by the Court as aforesaid.
4. The Special Land Acquisition Officer noticed that the petitioner had made his application under Section 28A of the Act on the basis of the judgment and award of the Court dated 25.10.2000, on 29.1.2001. The Land Acquisition Officer held that upon an examination of the certified copy of the Court's award, on the foot of which the application under Section 28A(1) of the Act was moved, it is evident that the application has been made beyond the period of three months from the date of the award, contrary to what is envisaged under Section 28A of the Act. In the opinion of the Special Land Acquisition Officer, the application under Section 28A of the Act, was time barred. It is on the aforesaid reasoning that the impugned order has been passed rejecting the application under Section 28A as barred by time.
5. Mr. Shukla, learned counsel for the appellant has taken us through the application under Section 28A, in particular, the averments in paragraph No. 6 thereof and also through a photostat of the certified copy of the judgment and award passed by the XIth Additional District Judge, Aligarh in LAR No. 70 of 1993 that was filed before the Special Land Acquisition Officer in support of the application under Section 28A of the Act. From a perusal of the folio, that is part of photostat of the certified copy at page No. 21 of the paper book, we find that an application for the certified copy of the Reference Court's order was made on 20.12.2000, and, it was ready on 25.1.2001. Delivery of the copy was taken on 25.1.2001. In the circumstances, the time spent in preparation of the certified copy of the Reference Court's award, that is the basis of the invocation of jurisdiction under Section 28A of the Act, has to be excluded from the period of limitation. This is precisely what is stated in paragraph No. 6 of the application under Section 28A of the Act. The proviso to Section 28A(1) aforesaid mandates exclusion from the period of three months limitation, for the purpose of making an application to the Collector, the day on which the Reference Court makes the award and the time spent in obtaining a certified copy thereof. The time spent in obtaining the certified copy of the Reference Court's award between 20.12.2000 and 25.1.2001 is 36 days which have to be added to the availabl
The court established that the time taken to obtain a certified copy of a court award is excluded from the limitation period under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act.
The limitation period under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act is strict and cannot be extended based on personal circumstances or knowledge of the judgment.
Delay in application under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 cannot be condoned; strict adherence to three-month limit is mandatory.
The limitation period for seeking redetermination of compensation under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act begins from the date of the original court's award, not from appellate decisions.
The right under S.28A of the Act allows redetermination of compensation based on any award, not just the earliest, countering potential inequalities in compensation payments.
Timely decision on applications for re-determination of compensation under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is emphasized by the court.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.