SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(JK) 533

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
FAYAZ AHMAD WANI – Appellant
Versus
HAMEEDA – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. Setting-aside of the Order dated 24th October 2018, passed by the court of Additional Sessions Judge, Pulwama (for short “Revisional Court”) in a Revision Petition titled as Mst. Hameeda v. Fayaz Ahmad Wani, is sought for by petitioner on the grounds mentioned in instant petition.

2. I have heard learned counsel for parties and considered the matter.

3. Respondent (Mst. Hameeda) filed an application under Section 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (J&K) for maintenance way back in the year 2009, before the court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class (Munsiff) Pulwama (for short “Trial Court”). The said application was decided vide ex parte judgement dated 14th December 2009. Revision against ex parte judgement was preferred, which was, however, dismissed on 9th August 2012. A petition under Section 561-A, Cr.P.C., bearing 561-A no.185/2012 was preferred before this Court, in which an order dated 3rd July 2013 was passed directing the Trial Court to decide the application under Section 488 Cr.P.C. on merits after providing opportunity of hearing as well as recording evidence of either side.

4. The Trial Court vide order/judgement dated 5th February 2018 dismissed respondent’

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top