SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M. A. CHOWDHARY
Ghulam Mohammad Pandit – Appellant
Versus
Mehbooba Akhter – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Imtiyaz Sofi, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. G.N.Shaheen, Advocate

JUDGMENT

This Civil 1st Appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 16.03.2016, (for short ‘the impugned judgment) passed by the court of learned 3rd Additional District Judge Srinagar in Civil Original Suit No.18/N titled Mehbooba Akhter & Ors. Vs. Ghulam Mohammad Pandit & Ors., in terms whereof the appellant has been directed to make the payment of monthly maintenance @ Rs.4500/-, Rs.6000/- and Rs.4500/- in favour of respondents 1, 2 and 3 respectively, with effect from 19.05.2003, and setting off the monthly interim maintenance paid @ Rs.2000/- per month in favour of respondents 2 and 3.

2. The impugned judgment has been challenged through the medium of the instant appeal, inter alia on the following grounds:—

(a) That the trial court has not at all discussed the evidence produced by the appellant in support of the issues framed by the trial court, which rendered the impugned judgment and decree perverse and unsustainable under law;

(b) That the appellant had led the evidence wherein he proved that he has divorced respondent No.1 on 15.02.2005 in presence of two witnesses who also proved the said fact and the trial court has not discussed their evidence wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top