Back
SINDHU SHARMA
Sada Nand – Appellant
Versus
J&K Special Tribunal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. relevant facts regarding land ownership and rights. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claims of the petitioner against co-owner status. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's affirmation of legal interpretations. (Para 5) |
JUDGEMENT
1. Petitioner is aggrieved of the order of the J&K Special Tribunal dated 20.09.1991 in case titled "Sadanand v. Prithipal & Ors.", vide which, the revision petition filed by the petitioner was disposed of and the order of the Agrarian Reforms Commissioner was upheld to the extent of holding the respondent Nos. 1 to 6 entitled to the share of 27 kanals 3 marlas.
2. Briefly stated the material facts are as under:-
b. The mother of Amarnath namely Kubjaan, who has four children Amarnath, Vasdev, Ratno Devi and Shanti Devi. It was on the death of Amar Nath that the land was given to his mother and, therefore, all these surviving three children became co-owners after the death of the
A co-sharer in possession cannot claim tenancy against other co-sharers, as personal cultivation by one is deemed for all, making Agrarian Reforms Act provisions inapplicable.
Limited scope of judicial review in correcting errors of jurisdiction and manifest errors apparent on the face of the proceedings.
The judgment emphasizes the limited scope of judicial review, the application of the law of limitation with full rigour, and the importance of considering the circumstances and record in condoning de....
Point of Law : Section 3-A of the Act of 1976, a displaced person, claiming occupancy rights, must demonstrate that he has been allotted the evacuee land and has been in cultivating possession thereo....
The court emphasized that findings based on incorrect co-sharer status and unjustified delay in appeals led to a miscarriage of justice, allowing the appeal and setting aside previous orders.
The court upheld the jurisdiction of revenue authorities under the Jammu and Kashmir Agrarian Reforms Act, affirming their findings on land ownership and possession as valid and within their competen....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Agrarian Reforms Act and the Tenancy Act in determining the validity of mutations and the rights of inheritance.
The finality of mutations under the Agrarian Reforms Act, the requirement to challenge the attestation of mutations, and the invalidity of creating tenancy after May 1973 as per section 13 of the Act....
A petitioner cannot pursue a new writ petition regarding land already contested in previous legal actions, emphasizing the need for resolution of prior matters.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
