Back
JAVED IQBAL WANI
Building Operation Controlling Authority, Municipal Area Jammu – Appellant
Versus
Vikas Gupta – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of construction and violations (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments on jurisdiction and legality of actions (Para 5 , 8) |
| 3. tribunal's findings regarding violations and compounding decisions. (Para 6) |
| 4. court’s analysis on nature of violations (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. finality of orders under the act (Para 11) |
| 6. conclusion: petition dismissed (Para 12) |
JUDGEMENT
1. The Building Operations Controlling Authority, Municipal Area, Jammu, through its Commissioner along with Joint Commissioner (A), Jammu Municipal Corporation, Jammu, has invoked the extraordinary writ jurisdiction of this court enshrined in Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of Certiorari for quashing order dated 10.7.2020 (for short the impugned order) passed by J&K Special Tribunal/respondent 2 herein (for short the Tribunal) in appeal titled as "Shri Vikas Gupta versus Joint Commissioner (A)”.
2. The background facts under the shade and cover of which the instant petition has been filed would reveal that the respondent 1 herein while possessing a plot of land measuring 3637 sft. situated at Ambedkar Chowk (Panama Chowk), Jammu, came to be granted permission for raising commercial construction
The court upheld the Tribunal's decision to compound minor construction violations, emphasizing the importance of administrative finality in factual disputes and limiting high court intervention.
The Tribunal has the authority to compound minor building violations, and its findings on such matters are final, especially when the petitioner fails to act on submitted revised plans.
The court emphasized that it cannot go into disputed questions of fact while exercising writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution and highlighted the finality of orders and the bar on j....
The Tribunal has the authority to regularize minor violations of building regulations, and the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction does not extend to re-evaluating factual determinations made by lo....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the provisions of the Control of Building Operations Act, particularly regarding the authority to challenge judgments and the....
The Executive Officer lacked jurisdiction to compound building violations, which must be addressed by the Municipal Committee under the applicable laws.
Unauthorized constructions cannot be legitimized due to administrative delays; strict compliance with building regulations is essential.
A demolition notice issued without proper service of a show-cause violates principles of natural justice, thus rendering the notice void and enabling the affected party to defend themselves upon re-i....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
