Back
MOHAN LAL
Subash Chand Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Puran Singh – Respondent
JUDGEMENT
1. Appeal U/S 173 of MOTOR VEHICLES ACT has been preferred by appellant against impugned judgment and award dated 25.09.2010 passed in File No._/claim titled Subash Chand Sharma v. Puran Singh & Ors. For enhancement of the awarded amount of Rs. 79,200/- passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred as MACT Jammu).
2. Aggrieved of and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment/award, appellant has assailed it's legality, correctness and propriety and sought it's modification/ enhancement on the following grounds:-
The main legal point established in the judgment is the assessment of compensation in injury cases, considering factors such as permanent disability, loss of future earnings, pain and sufferings, and....
In motor accident injury claims, add 40% to notional income of self-employed below 40 years for future prospects; separately award for loss of amenities where disability affects life activities; hous....
![Wahidsab Badasabmiya Saiyed VS Hardevsingh Mahednrasing Jat [Deleted] - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 1631](https://supremetoday-s3.b-cdn.net/Gujarat_2.png)
In cases of permanent disability due to motor accidents, courts must consider proven income, future prospects, and the severity of injuries when determining compensation.
Compensation under the Motor Vehicle Act must be just and reasonable, reflecting the claimant's actual loss, including permanent disability and income loss.
The court affirmed that compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act must be just and fair, considering the severity of injuries and the claimant's permanent disability.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
