SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Jhk) 562

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Ram Badan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


ORDER

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.

1. In both the cases, as petitioner is common and common question of law involved, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

2. In WP (C) No. 942 of 2003, the petitioner has challenged the cut off date of 1st August, 2002 as fixed to count the minimum age of eligibility of 22 years for appointment to the post of Assistant Engineer in Public Health Engineering Department (PHED for short) and notified vide Advertisement No. 12/02-03 with further prayer to direct the respondents to decrease the minimum age limit, as mentioned in Clause-IV of the advertisement aforesaid and to accept the application of the petitioner for consideration of his case for appointment against the post of Assistant Engineer along with others.

In other case, WP (C) No. 946 of 2003, similar prayer has been made by the petitioner against the minimum age of 22 years as on 1st August, 2002 prescribed for appointment in different State Civil Services, vide Advertisement No. 11/02-03 published by Jharkhand Public Service Commission (JPSC for short).

3. The case of the petitioner is that, he passed the matriculation examination in 1995 with 1st Division, completed












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top