SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Jhk) 31

N.N.TIWARI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Pratap Constructions, Through Its Proprietor – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


ORDER

1. The appellant has preferred this appeal against the order dated 9.11.2004, passed in W.P.(C) No. 2961/2004 whereby the said writ application filed by him was disposed of without accepting the appellants prayer for quashing the letter No. 669 dated 4.6.2004, issued by the Deputy Development Commissioner (respondent No. 2). The appellant had filed the said writ application, inter alia, praying for quashing the aforesaid letter No. 669 dated 4.6.2004, issued by the respondent No. 2, whereby the appellants contract for transportation of food grains was terminated as a corollary and consequence of cancelling the letter No. 506 dated 31.3.2004 by which the contract for transportation of food grains under District Rural Employment Programme for the financial year 2004-05 had been awarded.

2. According to the appellant, he was awarded the contract for transportation of food grains for district rural employment agency, to transport to each block on certain terms and conditions incorporated in the agreement dated 25.1.2002. The said agreement was for the period from June 2002 to March 2003. The appellant successfully completed the terms in accordance with the stipulation of the agreem












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top