SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Jhk) 1190

N.N.TIWARI
SARASWATI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
BRIJ SHANTIMANI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Manjul Prasad, S.K.MAZUMDAR

Judgment :

( 1 ) THESE four appeals arise out of the judgment and decree passed by learned Trial Court in Partition Suit No. 153/ 1972. Two appeals,. e. First Appeal No. 18 of 1999 (R) filed by Smt. Saraswati Singh (defendant No. 3 in the suit) and First Appeal no. 20 of 1999 (R) filed by Anil Kumar singh (the defendant No. 1 in the suit) are against the judgment and preliminary decree dated 28-11-1998 passed by learned sub-Judge-VII, Ranchi in the said suit whereas First Appeal No. 73 of 2001 filed by Smt. Saraswati Singh (defendant No. 3 in the suit) and First Appeal No. 74 of 2001 filed by Anil Kumar Singh (said defendant no. 1) are against the final decree dated 26-7-2001 passed in the said Partition Suit No. 153 of 1972.

( 2 ) SINCE all the appeals are based on the same facts, evidences and material and the parties are also common, the same were heard together and are being disposed of by this judgment.

( 3 ) THE original plaintiff Surendra Sinha had filed the said partition suit, praying decree for partition of 3/4th share in item Nos. 1 and 2 and 1/4th share in item Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6. 7. 8, 9 and 10 of the Schedule appended to the plaint and also for a decree for rendition of








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top