IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
R. BANUMATHI, APARESH KUMAR SINGH, JJ.
Tata Steel Limited - Petitioner
Vs.
State of Jharkhand & Ors. – Respondents
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C)No. 2995, 2999 of 2008 With W.P.(C)No. 1504, 1505 of 2009
Decided On : 12th, March, 2014
(B) Mineral Concession Rules, 1960-Rules 64-B and 64-C r/w Section 9 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957---If a processed mineral is removed from the mining lease area or if ROM removed from mining lease area for processing to outside the leased area, then royalty is payable on such processed mineral or ROM—Petitioner is liable to pay royalty only on mineral removed from its mining lease area.
(C) Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 64-B, 64-C and 51 r/w Section 9 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957---Demand notice for royalty must be issued within reasonable period even in absence of any specified period of limitation in this regard.
R. Banumathi, J.
In these writ petitions, the Petitioner, interalia, challenges the validity of Rules 64B and 64C of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 inserted by the Central Government, Ministry of Mines and the petitioner also challenges the demand of royalty raised by the State of Jharkhand on the “processed coal”(washed coal) contending that royalty is payable only on Run-Of-Mine (ROM) extracted by it at the rate prescribed in the Second Schedule and liability to pay royalty is not postponed after processing. Additionally, WP(C) No. 2995 of 2008 also questions the demand of royalty on de-shale rejects on the ground that it does not fall within the category of A to G of Colliery Control Order and is non-gradable and thus, is not a “mineral” liable for payment of royalty under the Second Schedule of the Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The petitioner also seeks for refund of royalty paid in excess of rates at Run-of-Mine (ROM) stage during the period from November, 2008 and also the deposits made in compliance of the interim orders in the writ petitions.
2. The Petitioner, Tata Steel Limited, is a company incorporated under the Companies Act. The Petitioner, Tata Steel Ltd., holds mining leases for coal in the State of Jharkhand. In WP(C)Nos. 2995 and 2999 of 2008, the Petitioner, Tata Steel, holds a mining lease of coal over an area of 13007 Bigha in various villages in the district of Ramgarh (erstwhile Hazaribagh), which is also known as West Bokaro Colliery, and the above mine is a captive coal mine. The above mines are captive coal mines, i.e. coal produced or raised from the above leased area is solely for self use or consumption. The Petitioner has two washery plants within the leased area where the raw coal produced from the mine is washed to improve the quality of grade of the coal for being sent for its use in its Steel Plant at Jamshedpur. In W.P (C) Nos.1504 and 1505 of 2009, the petitioner holds six self amalgamated mining leases of coal over an area of 3511.63 acres in various villages in the district of Dhanbad for a period of 99 years, which comes under the administrative control of Jamadoba Group of Collieries of Tata Steel. The above mines are captive coal mines. In the above leased area, the petitioner has two washery plants and the petitioner has also a captive power plant. In the District of Dhanbad, the Petitioner, Tata Steel, also holds five self amalgamated mining leases of coal over an area of 1996.19 acres in various villages for a period of 99 years, which comes under the administrative control of Bhelatand Group of Collieries of Tata Steel. In Bhelatand group of collieries, the petitioner has two washery plants and a captive power plant. In Jamadoba Group of Collieries, Jamadoba Coal Processing Plant is situated within the leasehold area, likewise, in Bhelatand Group of Collieries, Bhelatand Coal Processing Plant is situated within the leasehold area. The above coal mines of the petitioner are captive coal mines, i.e. coal produced or raised from the mines in the above leased area is solely for self-use for its steel plant at Jamshedpur. The process of washing generates clean coal, middlings, tailings and rejects, each of which has an end-use. After washing of coal in the washery plant, clean coal/steel grade of coal is sent to Petitioners own steel plant at Jamshedpur for production of iron and steel. The middlings and rejects are used by the petitioner in the respective power plants situated in the aforesaid collieries. Some quantity of middlings and tailings and rejects generated from the washery are subsequently sold to end users after obtaining permission from the authority.
3. In CWJCNo.1/1984(R), the petitioner sought declaration that it was liable to pay royalty on tonnage of the washed coal, when it is removed from the coal washery. Vide order dated 7.8.1990 passed in CWJC No.1/1984(R), learned Single Judge held that royalty is payable on the weightage of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.