RAVI NATH VERMA
Devendra Kumar Agarwalla – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
The petitioners of the above three criminal writ petitions have invoked the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding arising out of Complaint Case No. 2703 of 2014 including the order taking cognizance dated 04.03.2015 whereby the learned Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad has held that there is sufficient materials on the record for further proceeding against all the accused persons under Sections 323, 341, 403, 406, 417, 421, 423, 424, 465 and 120-B I.P.C. and under Section 465 of I.P.C. against one of the accused Naveen Tulsiyan.
2. The factual score as depicted in the complaint petition is that the complainant and accused persons nos. 1 to 5 of the complaint petition are own brothers and co-sharers of a joint Hindu Family and for better functional control of the ever expanding wealth of the joint family, management and control of the hotch-pot over different assets were given to different family members to act as a custodian. Adarsh Kumar Agarwalla and Devendra Kumar Agarwalla- the accused no.1 and 2 respectively were made the Directors of M/s Anup Malleables Ltd. and other
G. Sagar Suri and another Vs. State of U.P. and others
Indian Oil Corporation Vs. NEPC India Ltd. and others
GHCL Employees Stock Option Trust Vs. India INFOLINE Ltd.
Chandran Ratnaswami Vs. K.C. Palanisamy and others
Kamala Devi Agarwal Vs. State of W.B. and others
Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma and others Vs. State of Bihar and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.