I.A. No. 8152 of 2017

1. This interlocutory application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 700 days in preferring this Civil Review Application.

2. Having heard learned counsels for both the sides and looking to the reasons stated in this interlocutory application especially in paragraph nos. 3, 4 and 5, there are reasonable reasons for condonation of delay. I, therefore, condone the delay of 700 days in preferring this Civil Review Application.

3. I.A. No. 8152 of 2017 is, therefore, allowed and disposed of.

Civil Review No. 29 of 2017

1. This Civil Review application has been preferred for modification/review of an order passed by this Court dated 13.4.2015 in I.A. No. 1038 of 2010 in Company Petition No. 3 of 2003.

2. Having heard learned counsels for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that during pendency of Company Petition No. 3 of 2003, interlocutory application was preferred by this applicant for vacating or modifying the order of status quo granted by this Court vide order dated 11.12.2009 in Company Petition No. 3 of 2003 for the land admeasuring 1.5 acres of land situated at