H.C.MISHRA, RATNAKER BHENGRA
State of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
Mathura Yadav – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
H.C. MISHRA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants, including the convict Mathura Yadav, facing the death sentence, and learned counsel for the State, in the death reference, as also the appeal filed by the appellants.
2. This death reference and the connected Criminal Appeal arise out of the impugned Judgment of conviction dated 08th April, 2016 and Order of sentence dated 12th April, 2016, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Giridih, in S.T Case No.273 of 2011, whereby, the accused, Mathura Yadav has been found guilty and convicted for the offences under Sections 302, 376 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, whereas, the accused Bhikhari Mahto has been found guilty for the offence under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Upon hearing on the point of sentence, the appellant Mathura Yadav has been sentenced to the capital punishment of death, for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, directing him to be hanged by neck till he is dead. He is also sentenced to undergo R.I. for life for the offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, and R.I. for two years for the offence under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, whereas the
Shaikh Maqsood Vs. State of Maharashtra
Bachan Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Machi Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab
Shivaji Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mohd. Mannan Vs. State of Bihar
Purushottam Dashrath Borate Vs. State of Maharashtra
Vasanta Sampat Dupare Vs. State of Maharashtra
Ram Deo Prasad Vs. State of Bihar
Ramnaresh and Ors. Vs. State of Chattisgarh
Rameshbhai Chandubhai Rathod (2) Vs. State of Gujarat
Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik Vs. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.