ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Ashok Kumar Singh, son of late Ram Prit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand through the Central Bureau of Investigation (C. B. I) – Respondent
1. Heard Mr. Indrajit Sinha, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in Cr.M.P. No.1684 of 2015.
2. Heard Mrs. Ritu Kumar, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner along with Mr. Ravi Kumar Singh, Advocate in Cr.M.P. No.1685 of 2015.
3. Heard Mr. Ravi Kumar Singh, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in Cr.M.P. No.1686 of 2015.
4. Heard Mr. Rajiv Nandan Prasad, counsel appearing on behalf of the Central Bureau of Investigation in all the cases.
5. All these cases arise out of R.C. Case No.3(S) of 2014 – (R) dated 28.02.2014 (F.I.R. No.0932014S0003) registered for alleged offence punishable under Section 120B/34, 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 202 of Indian Penal Code including the order dated 13.08.2015 whereby cognizance has been taken against the petitioners for offence punishable under Section 120B read with Section 420 of Indian Penal Code and Section 13(2) read with Section13(1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Since all these cases arise out of order taking cognizance arising out of the same F.I.R, therefore, they have been tagged and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
6. Counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners in Cr.
Smt. Urmila Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand
Rajiv Kumar Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.
Neera Yadav Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation” reported in (2017) 8 SCC 791
Balwant Singh & Anr. Vs. Daulat Singh (dead) by L.Rs. & Ors.
Narasamma & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors., (2009) 5 SCC 591
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.