JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. M. A. Niyazi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners alongwith Mr. Shailesh Kr Singh and Mr. Kumar Basant, Advocates.

2. Heard Mr. Rohit Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party- Central Bureau of Investigation.

3. All the three cases arise out of the common order whereby the petition for discharge filed by the petitioners under Section 239 Cr.P.C. has been rejected and consequently, charge has been framed against them vide order dated 20.11.2018 under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 420, 409, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code.

4. So far as the Cr. Revision No. 23 of 2019 is concerned, the same has been filed by the company namely M/s Auroma Coke Limited and one of its directors namely Prashant Tulsyan. Cr. Revision No. 1717 of 2018 has been filed by another director of the company namely Vimal Kumar Tulsyan and Cr. Revision No. 1709 of 2018 has been filed by the other two directors namely Rajiv Tulsyan and Sanjeev Kumar Tulsyan.

5. In the present case, charge-sheet dated 31.10.2012 was filed under Section 120B read with Sections 420, 409, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code against the company, nam