RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Reena Kumari, D/o. Uchit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jharkhand Public Service Commission – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
With the consent of the parties, hearing of the matters has been done through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and/or video quality.
2. It has been submitted by Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants, that in all these appeals similar issues are involved, therefore, all the appeals may be heard together and may be disposed of by common order.
3. The same submission has been made by the learned counsel appearing for the State and the JPSC.
4. In view thereof and considering the fact that the issues involved in the four appeals are similar, all have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
5. These appeals preferred under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent are directed against the order/judgment dated 15.03.2021, 13.04.2021 and 07.04.2021 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in writ petitions being W.P.(C) No.864 of 2021, W.P.(S) No.1214 of 2021, W.P.(S) No.1186 of 2021 and W.P.(S) No.1055 of 2021 respectively wherein the issue raised pertains to issuance of following direc
The State of Andhra Pradesh v. T. Ramakrishna Rao and Others
Dr. Ami Lal Bhat v. State of Rajasthan and Others
Rajasthan Public Service Commission v. Smt. Anand Kanwar and Others
K. Nagaraj and Others v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Another
State of Jharkhand and Others v. Ashok Kumar Dangi and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.