JUDGMENT :

1. With the consent of the parties, hearing of the matter has been done through video conferencing. They have no complaint whatsoever about any audio and video quality.

I.A. No.3362 of 2021:

2. This interlocutory application has been filed for amendment of ground (B) taken in the memorandum of appeal as according to the appellants, ground (B) is not the complete sentence and the said error has been committed inadvertently.

3. Accordingly, since the amendment is very much formal in nature, we allow the appellants to amend ground (B), as has been stated in paragraph-7 of the present interlocutory application.

4. I.A. No.3362 of 2021 stands disposed of accordingly.

I.A. No.10305 of 2019:

5. This interlocutory application has been filed for condoning the delay of 61 days, which has occurred in preferring this appeal.

6. Heard learned counsel for the appellants.

7. Having regard to the averments made in this application, we are of the view that the appellants were prevented by sufficient cause from preferring the appeal within the period of limitation.

8. Accordingly, I.A. No.10305 of 2019 is allowed and the delay of 61 days in preferring the appeal is condoned.

L.P.A. No.751 of 2019:

9.