ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Laxmi Narayan Mahato, son of Vijay Mahato – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.
1. Heard Mr. Anil Kumar, the learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in Criminal Revision Nos. 172 of 2014 and 261 of 2014.
2. Heard Mr. Gautam Kumar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in Cr. Revision No. 1098 of 2014.
3. Heard Ms. Priya Shrestha, the learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the opposite party- State in Cr. Revision No. 172 of 2014.
4. Heard Mrs. Ruby Pandey, the learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the opposite party- State in Cr. Revision No. 1098 of 2014.
5. Heard Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, the learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the opposite party- State in Cr. Revision No. 261 of 2014.
6. All the three criminal revision petitions are directed against the common judgment dated 31.01.2014 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa in Criminal Appeal No. 100/2013 and Criminal Appeal No. 102/2013, whereby the learned appellate court dismissed the criminal appeals confirming and upholding the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 30.08.2013 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Porahat at Chaibasa in G.R. Case No. 384/1995, T.R. No. 05/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.