JUDGMENT :

R. Mukhopadhyay, J.

Heard Mr. Sanjay Piprawall, learned counsel for the appellant in L.P.A. No. 82 of 2021, Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, learned Advocate General for the appellants in L.P.A. No. 85 of 2021 and Mr. Anupam Lal Das, assisted by Mr. Saurav Shekhar, learned counsels appearing for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 in both the appeals.

2. Since in both these appeals the appellants are aggrieved by the order dated 21.01.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(S). No. 53 of 2020 the same are being disposed of by this common order.

3. The appellants have challenged the order dated 21.01.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(S). No. 53 of 2020 by virtue of which Advertisement No. 05/2019 which was impugned to the writ application has been set aside and the retrospective application of 10 % Economically Weaker Section quota was held to be against Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently the State Government was directed to modify Advertisement No. 05/2019 to the extent that 10 % quota for Economically Weaker Section shall not be made effective retrospectively for the vacancy of the years 2013 and 2015. The appellants are also aggrieved by the di