SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 33

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Ravi Ranjan, Sujit Narayan Prasad, JJ.
Mukesh Kumar and ors. - Appellants
Versus
State of Jharkhand through Principal Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms & Rajbhasha Vibhag and ors. – Respondents
L.P.A. No.145 of 2021
Decided On : 06-01-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Manoj Kumar Ram, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Piyush Chitresh, A.C. to A.G., Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate

Headnote:

Jharkhand Combined Civil Services Examination Rules, 2021 - Rule 4 - Civil Service Rule, 1951 - Rule 3 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 16 - Combined Civil Service Competitive Examination - Age gap of those whose age expired due to non-compliance of Rule 3 of Civil Service Rule, 1951 - Case of writ petitioners that one advertisement being Advertisement was published for Combined Civil Service Competitive Examination-2017, 2018 and 2019 in State of Jharkhand, wherein suitable relaxation was given for computation of upper age limit as for all clubbed vacancies following pattern adopted in earlier six consecutive yearly vacancies - However, due to Covid-19 pandemic, said vacancy could not be finalized and in meantime, Rules, 2021 was notified in the month of January, 2021 which was to be effective prospectively - Thereafter, JPSC advertised Jharkhand Combined Civil Services Competitive Exam, 2021 through JPSC website - Held, Advertisement was issued for filling up 60 vacancies on basis of unamended Rule i.e. unamended Rule 5, but subsequently Rule 5 was amended and in meanwhile vacancies increased to 200 and, therefore, Commission decided to hold a fresh examination under amended Rule 5 but High Court turned down this proposal and directed Commission to hold a separate examination for those who had applied in 1968 under unamended Rule in respect of original 60 vacancies and to invite separate applications and hold a separate examination for remaining 140 vacancies - It has been informed by the learned counsel appearing for respondent State of Jharkhand as also Jharkhand Public Service Commission that similar issue fell for consideration before this Court in L.P.A. along with analogous cases - Aforesaid order has been affirmed by Hon'ble Apex Court in S.L.P. (C) as would appear from order which has been produced before this Court for its perusal - Appeal dismissed.

ORDER :

With the consent of the parties, hearing of the matter has been done through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and/or video quality.

2. The instant appeal preferred under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent, is directed against the order/judgment dated 15.03.2021 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in writ petition being W.P.(C) No.864 of 2021, wherein the issue raised pertains to issuance of following directions as per the prayer made in the writ petition which read as under :-

    i. For a declaration that the proviso to rule 4 of the Jharkhand Combined Civil Services Examination Rules, 2021 is contrary to rule 3(IV) of the said Rule, 2021 and behest the parameters necessary to mitigate the age gap of those whose age expired due to non-compliance of Rule 3 of Civil Service Rule, 1951 which is pari-materia of Rule 4 of the New Rule 2021.

ii. For a further declaration that there is an abrupt departure of cut-off date for counting the upper age limit for appearing at the Combined Graduate Level Civil Service Exam for Civil Service under State, by notification dated 05.02.2021 was without any valid reason, and, the apparent objective to mitigate the ouster from zone of consideration in non-holding of the examination due from previously existing continuity was broken without any valid reason thereby 5 years galloping jump has dampened the prospects of all such candidates due to non-compliance of previous Rule 3 (now 3(IV) of 2021).

iii. For issuance of an appropriate court order, command, enjoining the respondents (concerned) to adhere to the previously adopted consequetivity as is evident from advertisement no.01/2020 (Annexure-2) so that there may not be any erosion of employment avenues under the state due to its lackadaisical omission to comply with the mandate of their own framed/adopted/referred rule 1951 and 2021 for those who wewre sufferers during 2011 50 2015 as the ‘raison d’etre’ mismatches.”

Learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition declining to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus for relaxation of the upper age limit for participation in the selection process of the 7th Combined Civil Services Competitive Examination to be conducted by Jharkhand Public Service Commission.

3. Brief facts of the case as per the pleadings made in the writ petitions which require to be enumerated herein, read as under :-

It is the case of the writ petitioners that one advertisement being Advertisement No. 01/2020 was published on 26.02.2020 for Combined Civil Service Competitive Examination-2017, 2018 and 2019 in the State of Jharkhand, wherein suitable relaxation was given for computation of upper age limit as on 01.08.2011 for all the clubbed vacancies following the pattern adopted in earlier six consecutive yearly vacancies. However, due to Covid-19 pandemic, the said vacancy could not be finalized and in the meantime, the Jharkhand Combined Civil Services Examination Rules, 2021 was notified in the month of January, 2021 which was to be effective prospectively. Thereafter, the JPSC advertised Jharkhand Combined Civil Services Competitive Exam, 2021 through JPSC website. As per Clause 4 of the said advertisement, the upper age limit has to be calculated on the basis of the cut-off date as 01.08.2016.

It is the further case of the writ petitioners that it would be evident on examining the earlier rule vis-à-vis the new rule that the provision of clubbing the vacancies for two or more years together which has been made for the first time by reasons of the proviso to Rule 4 of the Rules, 2021 is dehors the Rules itself.

It is the further case of the writ petitioners that if any vacancy arises in a particular year but the same could not be filled up for some reason or the other, then all the eligible candidates who are left over will have the subsisting right under Article 16 of t

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top