IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, JJ.
Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Shiv Nath Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
L.P.A. No. 145 of 2021
Decided On : 06-01-2022
Civil Services Examination Rules, 2021 - rule 3(IV) - Civil Service Rule, 1951 - Rule 3 - New Rule 2021 - Rule 4 - Constitution of India,1950 - Article 16 and 309 - For a further declaration that there is an abrupt departure of cut-off date for counting the upper age limit for appearing at the Combined Graduate Level Civil Service Exam for Civil Service under State, by notification dated 05.02.2021 was without any valid reason, and, the apparent objective to mitigate the ouster from zone of consideration in non-holding of the examination due from previously existing continuity was broken without any valid reason thereby 5 years galloping jump has dampened the prospects of all such candidates due to non-compliance of previous - It is the case of the writ petitioners that one advertisement being Advertisement No. 01/2020 was published on 26.02.2020 for Combined Civil Service Competitive Examination 2017, 2018 and 2019 in the State of Jharkhand, wherein suitable relaxation was given for computation of upper age limit as on 01.08.2011 for all the clubbed vacancies following the pattern adopted in earlier six consecutive yearly vacancies - Held, Court are of the view that the High Court fell into patent error bordering on perversity in issuing the mandamus on the reasoning quoted above. It is settled proposition of law that the eligibility of a candidate has to be determined on the basis of the terms and conditions of the advertisement in response to which the candidate applies. There is nothing on the record to show that the State Government was in any manner negligent or at fault in not making the direct recruitment during the period 1983-89. Be that as it may, the High Court was not justified in taking the clock back to the period when unfilled vacancies were existing and holding that since the respondent was eligible on the date when vacancies fell vacant, she continues to be so till the time the vacancies are filled. Due to inaction on the part of the State Government in not filling the posts year-wise, the respondent cannot get a right to participate in the selection despite being over-aged - appeal stands dismissed.
ORDER :
1. With the consent of the parties, hearing of the matter has been done through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and/or video quality.
2. The instant appeal preferred under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent, is directed against the order/judgment dated 15.03.2021 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in writ petition being W.P. (C) No. 864 of 2021, wherein the issue raised pertains to issuance of following directions as per the prayer made in the writ petition which read as under:
ii. For a further declaration that there is an abrupt departure of cut-off date for counting the upper age limit for appearing at the Combined Graduate Level Civil Service Exam for Civil Service under State, by notification dated 05.02.2021 was without any valid reason, and, the apparent objective to mitigate the ouster from zone of consideration in non-holding of the examination due from previously existing continuity was broken without any valid reason thereby 5 years galloping jump has dampened the prospects of all such candidates due to non-compliance of previous Rule 3 [now 3(IV) of 2021].
iii. For issuance of an appropriate court order, command, enjoining the respondents (concerned) to adhere to the previously adopted consequetivity as is evident from advertisement no. 01/2020 (Annexure-2) so that there may not be any erosion of employment avenues under the state due to its lackadaisical omission to comply with the mandate of their own framed/adopted/referred rule 1951 and 2021 for those who were sufferers during 2011 50 2015 as the ‘raison d’etre’ mismatches.
Learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition declining to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus for relaxation of the upper age limit for participation in the selection process of the 7th Combined Civil Services Competitive Examination to be conducted by Jharkhand Public Service Commission.
3. Brief facts of the case as per the pleadings made in the writ petitions which require to be enumerated herein, read as under:
It is the further case of the writ petitioners that it would be evident on examining the earlier rule vis-a-vis the new rule that the provision of clubbing the vacancies for two or more years together which has been made for the first time by reasons of the proviso to Rule 4 of the Rules, 2021 is dehors the Rules itself.
It is the further case of the writ petitioners that if any vacancy arises in a particular year but the same could not be filled up for some reason or the other, then all the eligible candidates who are left over will have the subsisting right under Article 16 of the
Census Commissioner and Others v. R. Krishnamurthy
Dr. Ami Lal Bhat v. State of Rajasthan and Others
J. Ranga Swamy v. Govt. of A.P. (1990) 1 SCC 288 : 1990 SCC (L&S) 76
K. Nagaraj and Others v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Another
Rajasthan Public Service Commission v. Smt. Anand Kanwar and Others
State of Andhra Pradesh v. T. Ramakrishna Rao and Others
State of Jharkhand and Others v. Ashok Kumar Dangi and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.