JUDGMENT :

SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.

1. Matter has been heard through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and/or video quality.

2. This intra-court appeal filed by the State-appellants under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment and order dated 08.11.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. (S) No. 3492 of 2016, whereby the decision of the authority as contained in Office Order No. 75 dated 09.02.2016 by which the benefits of upgradation of 1st and 2nd Assured Career Progression Schemes granted on 09.08.1999 and 10.03.2004 have been cancelled, has been quashed and set aside with a direction to pay the benefits of 1st and 2nd Assured Career Progression Schemes in accordance with law with a further direction that if the writ petitioner is found entitled to the 3rd MACP, the same shall also be considered and granted to him in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order.

3. The brief facts of the case, which are required to be narrated, are