ORDER :

1. With the consent of the parties, hearing of the matter has been done through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and/or visual quality.

I.A. No. 1096 of 2021

2. The instant interlocutory application has been filed for condonation of delay of 1044 days.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has submitted by referring to the ground taken in the instant delay condonation application to condone the delay since sufficient cause has been shown therein.

It has been submitted that since the appellant-writ petitioner is unemployed, sufficient time has been consumed in arranging the money to be incurred in filing the instant appeal.

It has further been submitted that the writ petitioner has got good case on merit and, therefore, the instant appeal may not be dismissed on limitation, rather, it may be heard on merit.

4. No counter affidavit, to the instant delay condonation application, has been filed. However, oral objection has been made on behalf of the respondent State of Jharkhand to reject the instant delay condonation application.

5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the reasons, this Court deems it fit and pro