RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
State of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
Md. Ahsanullah Khan, Son of Late Hamidulla Khan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
1. With consent of the parties, hearing of the matter has been done through video conferencing. They have no complaint whatsoever about any audio and video quality.
2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi and the Secretary, Water Resources Department, Ranchi are present in-person before this Court through video conferencing mode.
3. Heard the parties.
4. This is an appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent directed against the order/judgment dated 20.12.2018 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(S) No.5132 of 2016 whereby and whereunder while allowing the writ petition direction has been issued upon the respondents to consider the case of the writ petitioner for employment and also to come out with an advertisement as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order with a further direction that the writ petitioner is free to make application as and when the advertisement is floated and the respondents shall consider for giving relaxation of age and weight
Air India v. Nergesh Meerza and others [(1981) 4 SCC 335]
Narendra Kumar Tiwari and Others vs. State of Jharkhand and Others
State of Uttar Pradesh and Others vs. Arvind Kumar Srivastava and Others
State of Karnataka v. C. Lalitha
State of Karnataka v. C. Lalitha
Secretary, State of Karnataka and Others vs. Uma Devi and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.