IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, SANJAY PRASAD, JJ.
Mahadeo Oraon @ Nain - Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Respondent
Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 834 of 2014
Decided On : 03-02-2022
Prevention of Witch Craft Act - Section 3/4 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 - Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 134 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 313 - Threats of Committing Murder - Prosecution case arises out of Fardbeyan to effect that, wife of informant had gone to river for washing the utensils at which point of time, appellant came with a tangi and struck 2-3 times with tangi on head of wife of informant, which resulted in her becoming unconscious - It has further been alleged that appellant earlier used to issue threats of committing the murder of the wife of the informant – Held, P.W-2 in his Examination in Chief has stated about murder committed by appellant as deceased was practicing witchcraft. P.W-4 had appeared later on at place of occurrence but in his cross-examination he has stated about threats of murder given earlier by appellant - P.W-5 in his cross-examination has stated that it was not because appellant called his wife a witch which resulted in institution of case but at same time he has also stated that no one except appellant used to call deceased a witch - Aforesaid circumstances therefore clearly indicates existence of a motive – Court find and hold that learned trial court had rightly convicted appellant for offence under sections 302 of Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of Prevention of Witch Craft Practices Act and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs.2,000/-, rigorous imprisonment for three months and for offence under section 3 of Prevention of Witch Craft Practices Act and rigorous imprisonment for six months and fine of Rs.2,00/- for offence under section 4 of Prevention of Witch Craft Practices Act – Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
R. Mukhopadhyay, J.
This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 15.7.2014, passed by Smt. Rita Mishra, learned Additional Judicial Commissioner, III cum F.T.C. (CAW), Ranchi in Sessions Trial No. 404 of 2011/T.R. No. 551 of 2013, by which the appellant has been convicted for the offence under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Prevention of Witch Craft Act and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default of payment of fine he has been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for two months. The appellant has further been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months and is also liable to pay a fine of Rs.100/- and in default of payment of fine, he has been further sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for ten days for the offence under section 3 of the Prevention of Witch Craft Practices Act. The appellant has also been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and he is also liable to pay a fine of Rs.2,00/- and in default of payment of fine, he has been further sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for fifteen days for the offence under section 4 of the Prevention of Witch Craft Practices Act. All the sentences imposed are to run concurrently.
2. The prosecution case arises out of the Fardbeyan given by Jiyura Oraon to the effect that on 8.4.2011, at about 6.30 A.M, the wife of the informant had gone to Jamuni river for washing her mouth as well as the utensils, at which point of time, Mahadeo Oraon @ Nain (appellant) came with a tangi and struck 2-3 times with the tangi on the head of the wife of the informant, which resulted in her becoming unconscious. In spite of the wife of the informant becoming unconscious, the appellant continued to assault her with kicks and slaps. When the informant who was nearby saw the incident he rushed to the place of occurrence and the others who were nearby namely Bhagwat Bhagat, Gandri Orain and others also came and on seeing them the appellant fled away with the tangi towards Kakaria. The injured was taken to Bero hospital where she was being treated though her condition was stated to be serious. The reason for the occurrence as stated by the informant is that the brother of the appellant was suffering from mental illness for the last one year and the appellant used to say that the wife of the informant who practices witch craft had cast a spell of black magic over his brother. It has further been alleged that the appellant earlier used to issue threats of committing the murder of the wife of the informant.
3. Based on the aforesaid allegations, Lapung P.S. Case No. 16 of 2011 was instituted for the offences punishable under sections 341, 323, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Prevention of Witch Craft Practices Act against the sole accused (appellant).
4. The wife of the informant was later on referred to RIMS, where in course of treatment, she died.
5. On conclusion of investigation, chargesheet was submitted for the offences punishable under sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Prevention of Witch Craft Practices Act against the sole appellant and after cognizance was taken, the case was committed to the Court of Sessions where it was numbered as S.T. No. 404 of 2011. Charges were framed under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Prevention of Witch Craft Practices Act, which was read over and explained to the accused in Hindi, to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.
6. The prosecution in course of trial has examined as many as six witnesses in support of its case.
P.W-1-Yogendra Singh has stated that on 8.4.2011, he was posted at Kakaria Picket. In the morning, a person was seen standing near the gate with a tangi. When enquired, he disclosed that he had committed the murder of an old woman with the tangi. He had also disclosed that he had committed the murder since the old wo
Ram Swaroop and others Vs. State of Rajasthan
Yogesh Singh Vs. Mahabeer Singh and others
Abdul Sayeed Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Harjinder Singh @ Bhola Vs. State of Punjab
Niranjan Panja Vs. State of West Bengal
Kartare and others vs. State of U.P.
Ganesh Datt Vs. State of Uttarakhand
Mukhtiar Singh and Another Vs. State of Punjab
The conviction can be sustained based on trustworthy testimony of a sole eyewitness, even without corroborating medical evidence, as long as the defendant's mental state is not legally established.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; significant discrepancies in evidence warranted the appellant's acquittal.
A conviction for murder requires reliable and corroborated evidence, particularly when based on the testimony of a sole eyewitness; contradictions and lack of corroboration can lead to the reversal o....
The court acquitted the Appellants due to material contradictions in the evidence of the prosecutrix, unsupported by medical evidence, and improper appreciation of evidence by the learned Sessions Co....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the severity of the injuries is crucial in proving the intention or knowledge to commit murder.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.