RATNAKER BHENGRA
Jobraj Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ratnaker Bhengra, J.
Heard Mr. Pramod Kumar, the learned counsel for the appellants as well as Mrs. Vandana Bharti, the learned APP for the State.
2. Report of Superintendent of Police, Koderma, vide memo no. 51 dated 01-02-2020 has been received stating that the Appellant no. 1 Jobraj Mahto has died and letter to this effect of mukhiya of village-Badaki Dhamrai, Block-Chandwara, District-Koderma has been annexed. Hence, appeal of Appellant no. 1 Jobraj Mahto, stands abated.
3. Both the criminal appeals are preferred against the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence, both dated 16.04.2010, passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Koderma in Sessions Trial No. 446 of 1998, whereby and whereunder, all the appellants were convicted under Sections 147, 341 and 323 of the Penal Code, 1860 and the appellant Basudeo Mahto was further convicted under sections 324, 326 and 307 of the Penal Code, 1860. All the appellants were sentenced to undergo SI for one month each under Section 341 of the Penal Code, 1860; RI for one year each for the offence under Section 323 of the Penal Code, 1860 and RI for one year each for the offence under Section 147 of the Penal Cod
Jarnail Singh v. State of Punjab reported in (1982) 3 SCC 221 : AIR 1982 SC 70
Vishvas Aba Kurane v. State of Maharashtra reported in (1978) 1 SCC 474 : AIR 1978 SC 414
Ishwar Singh v. State of U.P. reported in (1976) 4 SCC 355
Munir Khan v. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (1970) 3 SCC 191
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.