RAJESH SHANKAR
Ragini Rani – Appellant
Versus
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Mumbai through Chairman-cum-Managing Director – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The writ petition is taken up today through Video conferencing.
The present writ petition has been filed for quashing and setting aside the order as contained in letter no. PK/LPG/TER-2001 dated 17.01.2020 issued under the signature of the respondent no. 3 – the Deputy General Manager, Jamshedpur LPG Regional Office, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL), whereby the LPG dealership (Domestic & Commercial) agreement dated 04.06.2013 (renewed vide agreement dated 03.06.2018) executed between the petitioner and HPCL, has been terminated. Further prayer has been made for issuance of direction upon the respondent-HPCL and its authorities to allow the petitioner to continue with the said dealership/distributorship agreement.
2. During pendency of the writ petition, I.A No. 327 of 2021 was filed by one Krishna Kumar Singh – father of the respondent no. 6 for impleading him as a party respondent. This Court vide order dated 23.03.2021, disposed of the said interlocutory application observing that since his son (the respondent no. 6 herein) had already been arrayed as respondent no. 6 in the present case, there was no reason to implead him as a party respondent. However he
Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Vs. AMR Dev Prabha
Harbanslal Sahnia & Anr. Vs. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. & Ors.
Jagdish Mandal v. State of Orissa
Joshi Technologies International Inc. Vs. Union of India
Ram Barai Singh & Company Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.