IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Rajesh Shankar, J.
Priti Srivastava - Petitioner
Versus
Jharkhand Academic Council, Ranchi through its Chairman and ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 1170 of 2022
Decided On : 28-04-2022
Admit Card Issue - Academic Career - Jharkhand Academic Council Act, 2002, Section 27(b) and (c), Regulations for Examinations, Clause 43 - The court addressed the issue of non-issuance of admit cards to students for the Intermediate Examination and the provisions of the Jharkhand Academic Council Act, 2002, and the Regulations for Examinations were discussed. The court directed the college to deposit examination fees for the students and ordered the JAC to issue admit cards for a special examination.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought direction for the issuance of admit cards for her daughter to appear in the Intermediate Examination, alleging non-issuance despite completing the course and paying the required fees. The respondent-JAC and respondent no. 4 filed counter affidavits stating the reasons for non-issuance of admit cards.
Finding of the Court:
The court found serious lapse and negligence on the part of the respondent no. 4, leading to the academic careers of several students, including the petitioner's daughter, being put in jeopardy. The court directed the respondent no. 4 to deposit examination fees for the students and ordered the JAC to issue admit cards for a special examination.
Issues: Non-issuance of admit cards, negligence of the college, impact on academic careers of students
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the negligence of the college in not depositing examination fees for the students despite sufficient time was irresponsible and put the academic careers of the students in jeopardy. The court directed the college to rectify the mistake by depositing the examination fees and ordered the JAC to issue admit cards for a special examination.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondent no. 4 to deposit examination fees for the students and ordered the JAC to issue admit cards for a special examination. Additionally, a cost of Rs. 50,000 was imposed on the respondent no. 4 to be deposited towards the Juvenile Justice Fund.
JUDGMENT :
The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondents to show cause as to why and under what circumstance, the petitioner’s daughter, namely, Jaya Shivangi has not been issued admit card so as to enable her to appear in Intermediate Examination (Science) for the Session 2020-22 from Sohan Lal Arya Inter College, Kalyanpur, Bokaro (respondent no. 4), despite the fact that she has completed the course and has also paid all the required fees. The petitioner has further prayed for issuance of direction upon the respondents to immediately issue the provisional admit card and allow the petitioner’s daughter to appear in the said examination to be conducted by the respondent-Jharkhand Academic Council.
2. The writ petition was initially taken up by this Court on 23.03.2022 and on the said date, learned counsel for the respondent-JAC prayed for an adjournment to come up with specific instruction so that the petitioner’s daughter and other similarly situated students would be permitted to appear in the special examination as well as to ensure that they would be able to appear in the forthcoming competitive examinations also. Thereafter, the writ petition was taken up on the next day i.e., on 24.03.2022 and on the said date, learned counsel for the respondent-JAC submitted that the JAC was taking all possible steps to conduct special examination of those candidates whose application forms were not forwarded by the respective colleges in time. Learned counsel assured the Court that career of all the eligible candidates including the petitioner’s daughter will not be adversely affected and a special examination would be conducted as soon as possible. Learned counsel, however, prayed for two weeks’ time to file counter affidavit with respect to the steps being taken by the respondent-JAC in this regard. On the said date, a notice was also issued to the respondent no. 4. Thereafter, counter affidavits were filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 to 3 (JAC) as well as the respondent no. 4. A supplementary counter affidavit in response to the counter affidavit filed by the respondent no. 4 has also been filed on behalf of the respondent-JAC.
3. The specific stand of the petitioner taken in the writ petition is that though the examination application form along with requisite fees was already submitted by the petitioner’s daughter in the office of the respondent no. 4, yet the admit card for appearing in the Intermediate Examination (Science) was not issued to her by the respondent-JAC.
4. The respondent nos. 1 to 3 (JAC) in their counter affidavit dated 13.04.2022 have submitted that total 1602 students submitted their examination forms to the JAC to appear in the Annual Intermediate Examination, 2022 from Sohan Lal Arya Inter College, Kalyanpur, Bokaro. According to Advertisement No. 40 of 2021, the date of submission of examination application form for the said examination was fixed from 28.10.2021 to 20.11.2021. However, the said date was further extended from 01.02.2022 to 08.02.2022 vide Advertisement No. 02/2022 at the request of various collages and students. Despite such extension of date, the respondent no. 4 did not submit the examination application forms of 83 students (65 in Science and 18 in Commerce) due to which the admit cards were not issued to them by the JAC. Out of the said 83 students, the checklist (annexed as Annexure-4 to the writ petition) with respect to the petitioner’s daughter mentions the challan status as “not paid”, which clearly suggests that the respondent no. 4 did not deposit her examination fee before the JAC due to which her admit card could not be issued. The respondent-JAC in the said counter affidavit while referring to Clause 43 of the “Regulations for Examinations” approved by the Jharkhand Academic Council under Section 27(b) and (c) of the Jharkhand Academic Council Act, 2002 has stated that compartmental examination is organized by the respondent-JAC for
The central legal point established in the judgment is the responsibility of the college to ensure the timely deposit of examination fees and the court's authority to direct necessary actions to rect....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of educational institutions to ensure the timely submission of examination forms and the issuance of Admit Cards to students for the....
The power of writ courts under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has to be exercised sparingly in academic matters, limited to cases where actions borne out of malafide or arbitrariness etc. a....
The court's decision was based on the principle that once the limited grievance of the petitioner had been redressed, and the petitioner had participated in the examination, the failure to qualify th....
Point of law: Petitioner submits her examination form along with examination fee and other details as required, on the portal of the respondent-University.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner's eligibility to appear in the 6th Semester Examination was determined based on the attendance requirement under Ordinance VII.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.