Back
JYOTI SINGH
Sunil – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Subordinate Selection Service Board (Government of NCT Delhi) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)
C.M. APPL. 46317/2019 (Exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 11247/2019 & C.M. APPL. 46316/2019 (interim measure)
3. Present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:
"a) Direct the Respondent to allow the petitioner to appear for the exam to be conducted on 24.10.2019 &25.10.2019; and/or
b) Direct the respondent to issue an Admit Card to the petitioner and thereby allowing him to successfully appear for the exam for the post of Lower Division Clerk post code 51/13; and/or
c) Direct the respondent to allow the petitioner to join the service for the post of LDC, if the petitioner succeeds in the said exam and fulfill all other parameters;"
4. This Court vide order dated 21.10.2019, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, had given liberty to the Petitioner to approach the Comptroller of Examinations on 22.10.2019 at 10.30AM.
5. Ms. Ahlawat, learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent submits that subsequently admit card was issued to the Petitioner since the limited grievance of the writ petitioner was that on account of technical error, he was unable
The court's decision was based on the principle that once the limited grievance of the petitioner had been redressed, and the petitioner had participated in the examination, the failure to qualify th....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the responsibility of the college to ensure the timely deposit of examination fees and the court's authority to direct necessary actions to rect....
Candidates participating in a selection process cannot later challenge its terms after being declared unsuccessful; acceptance of terms is binding.
Petitioner's failure to timely upload required documents and seek relief from the proper forum leads to dismissal of the application for extraordinary entry into examination.
The power of writ courts under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has to be exercised sparingly in academic matters, limited to cases where actions borne out of malafide or arbitrariness etc. a....
Courts should refrain from intervening in factual disputes in writ petitions and should only annul/cancel competitive exams with sufficient evidence of misconduct or negligence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
