SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 499

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.
Mahabir Mandal, s/o. Umakant Mandal - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand, Ors. - Respondents
W.P. (Cr.) No. 232 of 2022
Decided On : 07-07-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Manish Kumar.
For the Respondents: Mr. K.K. Singh.

The central legal point established is the application of Rule 54(5) of the Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Amendment Rules, 2017 for the release of seized minerals, and the imposition of specific conditions for the release of the vehicle.

Headnote:

Mines and Minerals - Release of Seized Vehicle - MMRD Act, 1957, Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2004, Indian Forest Act - 21 of MMRD Act, 1957, section 54 of Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rule 2004 - Rule 54(5) of the Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Amendment Rules, 2017

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought release of a seized tractor and trailer used for transporting sand, which was seized under various sections including 21 of MMRD Act, 1957 and section 54 of Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rule 2004.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner could deposit double the amount of the cost of the minerals for their release, as per Rule 54(5) of the Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Amendment Rules, 2017. The court also allowed the release of the vehicle under certain terms and conditions.

Issues: The main issue was the release of the seized minerals and vehicle under the relevant statutes and rules.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Rule 54(5) of the Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Amendment Rules, 2017 to allow the deposit of double amount for the release of minerals. The court also imposed specific conditions for the release of the vehicle.

Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed and disposed of, with directions for the deposit of double amount for mineral release and specific conditions for the release of the vehicle.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Manish Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. K.K. Singh, the learned counsel for the respondent State.

2. This petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 07.04.2022 passed by Shri Ranjeet Kumar, Principal Sessions Judge, Jamtara in Criminal Revision No.06/2022 whereby the revision application filed by the petitioner has been dismissed affirming the order dated 03.02.2022 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamtara in Jamtara P.S.Case No.124/2021 whereby the prayer for release of Tractor bearing registration no.J10CA-4421 and Trailor No.JH 10CA3923 belonging to the petitioner was rejected on the ground that confiscation proceeding is pending, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamtara.

3. The FIR was lodged on the following premise:-

    That the aforesaid vehicle was found transporting sand for which Jamtara P.S.Case No.124/2021 has been registered u/s 414 IPC, 21 of MMRD Act, 1957 and section 54 of Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rule 2004 on the basis of written complaint of the District Mining Officer submitted to the officer in charge Jamtara wherein it was alleged that on 25.09.2021 at about 12.30 p.m he along with some other police officials raided near Rajia river and Baraker river where they found some tractors were engaged in loading sand and they seized the tractors bearing registration No.Jh10BA-6709 and trainor bearing No.JH10BA-0645 loaded with 100 C.ft. sand, tractor bearing registration No.JH10CA-4421 and trailor bearing No.JH10CA 3923 loaded with 40 C.ft sand, Sonalika tractor bearing Engine No.3100FLU1481025116F18 and Chesis No.MYASR103027153 and trailor no. was not visible loaded with 100.C.ft sand tractor John Deere Engine No.PY3029D534058, Chasis No.1VY5036DAKA008329 and trailor no.was not visible loaded with 100 C.ft sand all are illegally loaded for which a case u/s 414 of IPC and section of MMRD Act and section 54 of Jharkhand Mines and Minerals Concessions Rules has been registered against the petitioner and others.

4. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not challenging the vires of any provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 read with Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner filed a petition for release of the mineral and vehicle, which was rejected by order dated 03.02.2022 by the learned C.J.M., Jamtara in Jamtara P.S. Case No.124/2021.

5. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction in this Court under Article-226 of the Constitution of India.

6. Mr. Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the amendment in Rule 54(5) of the Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2004, the same was incorporated in Jharkhand Mineral (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017 by virtue of Rule 13 thereof, the order may kindly be passed.

7. Mr. K.K.Singh, appearing for the State submits that in the light of Rule 54(5) of he Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2004, the petitioner is required to pay the double amount of the mineral and the arrangement has been granted in the said Rule. He further submits that for release of the mineral and the vehicle, the petitioner is required to follow the procedure as an interim measure.

8. Admittedly, the vehicle of the petitioner were seized on 25.09.2021 and the petitioner filed an application for release of the vehicle, but the same was rejected on 03.02.2022, however the said rejection was on the assumption that the confiscation proceeding is going on and that’s why the release of the said vehicle was rejected by the concerned Court.

9. There is no bar in the Mines & Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2004 for releasing the vehicles in the Statute, howeve

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top