RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Ram Kishun, son of Late Jagadish – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Central Coalfields Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
I.A.No.10952 of 2019
This interlocutory application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 22 days in preferring this Letters Patent Appeal.
2. Heard.
3. No counter affidavit has been filed opposing the prayer for condoning the delay.
4. Having regard to the averments made in this application, we are of the view that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from preferring the appeal within the period of limitation.
5. Accordingly, I.A.No.10952 of 2019 is allowed and delay of 22 days in preferring the appeal is condoned.
L.P.A. No.501 of 2019
6. The instant intra-court appeal preferred under Clause-10 of Letters Patent is directed against the order/judgment dated 03.05.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(S) No.4851 of 2014, whereby and whereunder, the direction sought for by the writ petitioner for release of C.M.P.F. dues, gratuity amount and family pension, have been decided to be paid in favour of the writ petitioner only on submission of succession certificate, being aggrieved with the same, the writ petitioner has preferred the instant appeal.
7. The brief facts of the case, as per the pleading mad
Govt. of W.B. v. Tarun K. Roy reported in (2004) 1 SCC 347
Harwindra Kumar v. Chief Engineer, Karmik & Ors.
Jagdish Lal v. State of Haryana reported in (1997) 6 SCC 538
U.P. Jal Nigam & Anr. V. Jaswant Singh & Anr.
Union of India v. Virpal Singh Chauhan reported in (1995) 6 SCC 684
Union of India v. C.K. Dharagupta reported in (1997) 3 SCC 395
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.