SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Narsingh Kumar Das, S/o Jagnarayan Lal Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shree Chandrashekhar, A.C. J.
I.A No. 11166 of 2023 in L.P.A No.575 of 2023
This interlocutory application has been filed for condoning the delay of 63 days in preferring L.P.A No. 575 of 2023.
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the appellant and considering the facts and circumstances of this case and also after going through the cause shown in this interlocutory application seeking condonation of delay, we find sufficient grounds to condone the delay of 63 days and, accordingly, I.A No. 11166 of 2023 is allowed.
I.A No. 11367 of 2023 in L.P.A No. 600 of 2023
3. This interlocutory application has been filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay in filing L.P.A No. 600 of 2023.
4. However, Registry has reported that this Letters Patent Appeal has been filed in time.
5. Accordingly, I.A No. 11367 of 2023 is disposed of.
L.P.A Nos. 462 of 2023, 497 of 2023, 575 of 2023, 580 of 2023, 600 of 2023, 611 of 2023, 619 of 2023, 621 of 2023, 662 of 2023, 663 of 2023, 664 of 2023, 679 of 2023
6. In this batch of Letters Patent Appeals, the grievance raised by the appellants is that the writ Court did not even advert to their grievance that the wrong committed by
Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board & Ors. v. T.T. Murali Babu” (2014) 4 SCC 108
M.L. Patil (dead) through Legal Representatives Vs. State of Goa & Anr.
M.R. Gupta v. Union of India & Ors.” (1995) 5 SCC 628
Naib Subedar Lachhman Dass v. Union of India” AIR 1977 SC 1979
State of M.P. v. Nandlal Jaiswal” (1986) 4 SCC 566
State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. v. Arvind Kumar Srivastava & Ors. (2015) 1 SCC 347
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.