IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RAJESH SHANKAR, J.
Chars Pahan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand – Respondent
W.P.(C) No. 1068 of 2021
Decided on : 26-09-2022
Jurisdiction - Disqualification of Ward Councillor - Jharkhand Municipal Act, 2011 - Section 580, Section 18(2)
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition to quash a letter issued by the Additional Secretary-cum-Inquiry Officer, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Jharkhand, claiming it to be without jurisdiction. The letter directed the petitioner to appear before the officer in response to a complaint filed by another party seeking the petitioner's disqualification as Ward Councillor.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the issuance of the letter by the respondent no. 2 was not without jurisdiction, as the powers under Section 580 and Section 18(2) of the Jharkhand Municipal Act, 2011 operate parallel and independent of each other.
Issues: The main issue was whether the letter directing the petitioner to appear before the respondent no. 2 in response to a complaint seeking the petitioner's disqualification as Ward Councillor was without jurisdiction.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the powers under Section 580 and Section 18(2) of the Jharkhand Municipal Act, 2011 operate parallel and independent of each other, and the issuance of the letter was not without jurisdiction.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to change the nomenclature of the respondent no. 6 as “Barika Munda”. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing letter no. 627 dated 19.02.2021 (Annexure-3 to the writ petition) issued by the respondent no. 2 – Additional Secretary-cum-Inquiry Officer, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Jharkhand as, according to the petitioner, the same is without jurisdiction keeping in view the letter no. 83/Pan. dated 20.02.2020 (Annexure-2 to the writ petition) issued by the respondent no. 4, wherein it has been clearly observed that the petitioner may file an election petition under Section 580 of the Jharkhand Municipal Act, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act, 2011”) in the court of Munsiff, Khunti.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned letter dated 19.02.2021 issued by the respondent no. 2 is completely without jurisdiction as any matter with respect to disqualification of the Ward Councillor has to be raised by way of filing an election petition under Section 580 of the Act, 2011 on the grounds mentioned in Section 584 of the said Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to letter dated 20.02.2020 issued by the respondent no. 4 and submits that on a complaint filed by the respondent no. 6 for taking appropriate action against the petitioner with respect to allegedly furnishing false information in his nomination form, the respondent no. 4 informed the respondent no. 6 vide the said letter that for disposal of the matter raised by him, he may prefer an election petition under Section 580 of the Act, 2011 in the court of Munsiff, Khunti, which is the competent authority to hear the same. It is thus submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that if at all the respondent no. 6 is aggrieved with election of the petitioner as Ward Councillor, Ward No. 5, Khunti Nagar Panchayat in Municipal Election – 2018, he should file an election petition under Section 580 of the said Act instead of filing a complaint before the respondent no. 2 in pursuance of which the impugned letter dated 19.02.2021 has been issued to the petitioner directing him to appear before him on 26.02.2021 at 1:00 p.m. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that no effective step has been taken by the respondent no. 2 in the matter subsequent to issuance of the letter dated 19.02.2021.
3. Mr. Nehru Mahto, AC to GP-IV appearing on behalf of the State respondents, submits that the issue with respect to exercise of powers under Section 18(2) and Section 580 of the Act, 2011 has already been set at rest by this Court holding inter alia that both the powers operate parallel and independent to each other. Hence, issuance of letter dated 19.02.2021 by the respondent no. 2 to the petitioner is legal and justified.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the content of the writ petition. The issue raised in the present writ petition first fell for consideration of this Court in the case of “Md. Aftab Ansari Vs. The State Election Commission, Jharkhand & Ors.” reported in 2018 (2) JBCJ 453, wherein it was held as under:
The powers under Section 580 and Section 18(2) of the Jharkhand Municipal Act, 2011 operate parallel and independent of each other.
The availability of alternative remedy does not bar the exercise of writ jurisdiction when there is a violation of natural justice or when the decision-making process is without jurisdiction.
Point of Law : In our view, on proper interpretation of the Statute, after election process has come to an end, the State Election Commissioner, District Magistrate and the Election Officer cease to ....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is that the State Election Commissioner must consider disqualification issues based on unimpeachable materials and relegate parties to a competent....
The Election Tribunal has the jurisdiction to entertain an Election O.P. filed under Sec. 21(3) of the Telangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2018, and the burden of proof lies with the petitioner to disprove ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the timely submission of election expenses and the jurisdiction of the Divisional Commissioner in setting aside the District Collector's disqualifi....
The court emphasized the importance of mandatory averments and disclosures in Public Interest Litigation and found the PIL Petition to be politically motivated.
The court affirmed the legislative authority of the Election Commission to remove elected officials for disqualifications and established the burden of proof for authenticity rests on the individual.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.