IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RAJESH SHANKAR, J.
MBNS Institute of Education – Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand – Respondent
W.P.(C) No. 2394 of 2022
Decided on : 17-08-2022
Admission - B.Ed Courses - Jharkhand Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board - College of Professional Education - Maa Vaishno Devi Mahila Mahavidyalaya - NCTE Regulations - Adherence to Schedule
Fact of the Case:
The writ petition sought direction to admit students who applied online for B.Ed courses for the session 2021-2023 and those who passed their qualifying exams after 27.09.2021. The petitioner also requested to fill vacant B.Ed course seats after counseling.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners' request to admit students who failed to upload their results within the stipulated time cannot be granted as it contradicts the schedule fixed by the Supreme Court and the advertisement's unambiguous language. The court also noted that the petitioners' financial loss due to vacant seats cannot justify deviation from the fixed schedule.
Issues: Admission of students who failed to upload results within the stipulated time, financial loss of petitioner colleges, adherence to the schedule fixed by the Supreme Court and NCTE Regulations.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the schedule for fair and transparent admission and maintaining education standards, as established in the cases of College of Professional Education and Maa Vaishno Devi Mahila Mahavidyalaya. The court also highlighted that deviation from the schedule is impermissible and financial loss cannot justify such deviation.
Final Decision: The petitioners' request was dismissed as it lacked merit, and the writ petition was dismissed as it was covered by a previous judgment.
JUDGMENT :
The present writ petition has been preferred for issuance of direction upon the respondent-authorities to take admission of the students, who applied online on the Jharkhand Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board (hereinafter referred to as “JCECEB”) Portal in the B.Ed courses for the batch/session 2021-2023 and also those students who have passed their qualifying exams i.e., Bachelor’s Degree in the applicable subjects after 27.09.2021 till 17.05.2022 in terms with its sanctioned intake as mandated by National Council for Teachers Education (NCTE), as also to enable the students who otherwise being eligible for getting admitted in the B.Ed courses could not upload their graduation result within the time stipulated in pursuance of advertisement notice dated 03.09.2020 issued by the respondent no. 5 – JCECEB. The petitioner-college has further prayed for allowing it to fill up the seats in B.Ed course which remained vacant after conclusion of the counseling conducted in pursuance of Combined Entrance Examination conducted by JCECEB.
2. Mr. Sachin Kumar, learned AAG-II appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 to 3, while referring to order/judgment dated 04.08.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 2392 of 2022 (Rajeev Gandhi Memorial Teachers’ Training College, Digwadih, Dhanbad & Ors. Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.), submits that the said writ petition involving similar issue has already been dismissed.
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the order/judgment dated 04.08.2022 passed by this Court in the aforesaid writ petition, the relevant paragraphs of which read as under:
9. The thrust of the argument of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the sessions of many colleges were late owing to Covid-19 pandemic due to which the appearing batch students who got registered in B.Ed courses for Session 2021-23 could not pass their qualifying examination (Bachelor degree course) within time. Claim of the petitioners is that seats for Session 2021-23 are lying vacant and if the appearing batch students are allowed to be admitted in B.Ed course, they would arrange extra classes for them.
10. Per contra, according to learned AAG-II and learned counsel for the respondent no. 5, it was explicitly stipulated in the advertisement itself that the appearing batch students would upload their final marks/result of qualifying examination (Bachelor degree course) till 27.09.2021, failing which their names would not be included in the final merit list. In view of the clear stipulation in the advertisement, the petitioners’ prayer made in the writ petition is not worth consideration.
11. Before coming to the merit of rival contentions of the parties, it would be relevant to refer the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of “College of Professional Education” (supra), wherein the schedule for taking admission in the B.Ed course for the academic Session 2012-2013 and subsequent years has been fixed, which is reproduced as under:
| 1. | Publication of advertisement | 1-2-2011 |
| 2. | Sale of application forms and their submission | 10-2-2012 to 10-3-2012 |
| 3. | Date of entrance examination | 20-4-2012 to 25-4-2012 |
| 4. | Declaration of result | 25-05-2012 to 30-5-2012 |
| 5. | Commencement and completion of counselling | 1-6-2012 to 25-6-2012 |
| 6. | Last date of admissions after counselling | 28-6-2012 |
| 7. | Commencement of academic session | 1-7-2012 |
Medical Council of India v. Madhu Singh [(2002) 7 SCC 258]
Parshavanath Charitable Trust v. All India Council for Technical Education [(2013) 3 SCC 385
Rajan Purohit v. Rajasthan University of Health Sciences [(2012) 10 SCC 770]
Adherence to the schedule for admission in educational institutions is crucial for maintaining fairness, transparency, and education standards, and deviation from the schedule cannot be justified by ....
Adherence to the schedule fixed by the Supreme Court for B.Ed admissions is crucial for fair and transparent admission process in B.Ed colleges.
Eligibility stipulations for B.Ed. course admissions based on date of qualification were found arbitrary and discriminatory, requiring clearer future guidelines.
The court held that candidates who fail to apply by the stipulated deadline for BSc Nursing admissions cannot claim benefits from relaxations based on earlier judgments, emphasizing the finality of s....
The UGC's SOP allows universities to admit students based on qualifying marks, overriding strict adherence to entrance exam scores in specific circumstances.
Admission into Postgraduate Course in Dental Sciences – Undue sympathy would lead to perpetuating illegality and giving premium to students who got admissions illegally.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.