SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 741

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Sagir Ahmad S/o Abdul Sharif – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Amit Kumar Das.
For the Respondents: Ashok Kumar Sinha, Arup Kumar Dey.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

1. Heard Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Mr. Arup Kumar Dey, learned counsel for the State.

2. This petition has been filed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding including the order dated 09.06.2014 passed in Complaint Case No. 378 of 2014, pending in the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur.

3. The complaint case was filed by opposite party no. 2 against the petitioners alleging therein that he is a salesman cum in-charge of a shop of his father named as Beauty Center situated at Sakchi Market, Jamshedpur. On 04.11.2013, petitioner no. 1 called the complainant on mobile demanding Rs. 15 Lakhs as rangdari to be paid within 15 days, otherwise to face dire consequences. It was further alleged that again on 05.11.2013, petitioner no. 2 called the complainant on his landline phone and demanded Rs. 15 Lakhs saying that if said amount is not paid, then he will be killed. It was further alleged that thereafter petitioner no. 1 again repeated such demand and threatened to kill the complainant and his family. It was further alleged that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top