SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 1562

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Nayeem Sheikh and ors. - Petitioners
Versus
State of Jharkhand and ors. - Opposite Parties
Cr.M.P. No. 612 of 2016
Decided On : 20-12-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: :Mr. Yogesh Modi, Advocate
For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P.

General and omnibus allegations under Section 498-A of IPC without specific instances do not warrant continuation of criminal proceedings.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Section 498-A - Quashing of criminal proceedings - The petition was filed to quash proceedings under Section 498-A alleging dowry harassment and assault, with the court noting that the allegations were general and omnibus, failing to establish specific instances of involvement by the accused - The court emphasized the need for careful scrutiny in such cases to avoid uncalled-for harassment. (Paras 8-12)

Facts of the case:
The complainant alleged that after marriage, she faced torture from her in-laws, including demands for dowry and physical assault, leading to her filing a complaint after being ousted from the house.

Findings of Court:
The court found the allegations to be general and lacking specificity, indicating they arose from trivial issues rather than substantiated claims.

Issues: The main issue was whether the allegations against the petitioners warranted continuation of proceedings under Section 498-A.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the allegations were too vague to support a criminal charge, especially given the divorce prior to the filing of the complaint.

Result: The petition was allowed, and the proceedings were quashed.

JUDGMENT :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

Opposite party no.2 has refused to accept the notice and in view of that, notice upon opposite party no.2 has been validly served, which was observed by this Court vide order dated 04.05.2017. Today on repeated calls also, nobody has responded on behalf of opposite party no.2 and in view of that, this matter is being heard in absence of opposite party no.2.

2. Heard Mr. Yogesh Modi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sardhu Mahto, learned counsel for the State.

3. This petition has been filed for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding arising out of Complaint Case No.1687/14 including the order taking cognizance dated 15.12.2014, pending in the Court of the learned A.C.J.M., Giridih.

4. The complaint case was filed alleging therein that the complainant was married to petitioner no.1 in the year 2003. At the time of marriage, cash, gold and articles were given. After marriage, the complainant went to sasural and lived properly for three years and thereafter she was being tortured by her in-laws and demand of Rs.50,000/-and two wheeler was made as dowry and on non-fulfillment, she was tortured. It was further alleged that several times, meeting was convened to keep her properly but the accused persons never changed their behaviour. It was also alleged that on 09.10.2011, panchayati was convened and accused persons were directed to keep her properly. It was alleged that even then in-laws continue to torture her. It was further alleged that the accused-Rahimuddin committed rape upon her. It was also alleged that on 18.08.2014, all accused persons assaulted the complainant and sprinkled kerosene oil upon her and tried to kill her, but on intervention of the neighbours, she was saved. It was also alleged that the accused persons snatched her ornaments and children and in the night, she was ousted from the house alongwith her younger son. Thereafter, she went to her sister's house and then went to her Naihar at Giridih and filed this case.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the entire family members have been made accused in the case, arising under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. He submits that petitioner no.1 is the husband, petitioner no.2 is father-in-law, petitioner no.3 is mother-in-law, petitioner nos. 4, 6 and 7 are brothers-in-law and petitioner no.5 is the cousin father-in-law of opposite party no.2. He further submits that the petitioner divorced the opposite party no.2 on 20.08.2014 and she has also recognized the same. The said agreement is annexed at Annexure-2. He submits that on the next date i.e. 21.08.2014, the present complaint case has been filed. He further submits that only general and omnibus allegations are there. On these grounds, he submits that the entire criminal proceeding may kindly be quashed.

6. Learned counsel for the State submits that it appears that the learned Court has taken cognizance looking into the averments made in the complaint petition.

7. Although the case has been registered under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, however, the learned Court has been pleased to take cognizance against the petitioners under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. It is an admitted position aathat on 20.08.2014, Tlqwas made by the petitioner upon opposite party no.2, contained in Annexure-2 and on the very next day i.e. on 21.08.2014, the present complaint case has been filed. Looking into the complaint petition, it appears that there are only general and omnibus allegations against the petitioner, who happened to be husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law, brothers-in-law and cousin father-in-law of opposite party no.2.

8. Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code was inserted in the statute with the laudable object of punishing cruelty at the hands of husband or his relatives against a wife particularly when such cruelty had potential to result in suicide or murder of a woman as mentio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top