SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 764

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Rajkumar @ Kundan – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Aashish Kumar.
For the Respondents: Arup Kumar Dey, Neha Bhardwaj.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

1. Heard Mr. Aashish Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Mr. Arup Kumar Dey, learned A.P.P. appearing for the State and Ms. Neha Bhardwaj, learned counsel appearing for the O.P. No. 2.

2. This petition has been heard through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been heard.

3. This petition has been filed for quashing of the order dated 04.07.2014 passed in Ratu P.S. Case No. 128 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 2974 of 2013, whereby cognizance under Sections 341, 323, 342, 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act has been taken against the petitioners, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that for the same cause of action and for the same allegation another FIR has been lodged, which is numbered as Maner P.S. Case No. 320 of 2014 [in the State of Bihar] against the petitioners, which amounts to abuse of the pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top