SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 773

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Mahadeo Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Manoj Kumar Choubey.
For the Respondent: Suraj Verma.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

1. Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar Choubey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Suraj Verma, learned Spl. P.P. for the State.

2. This petition has been heard through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been heard.

3. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 07.08.2020 passed in connection with Manjhion P.S. Case No. 85 of 2020 corresponding to G.R. No. 1143 of 2020, whereby cognizance has been taken against the petitioner, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Garhwa.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cognizance order is not in accordance with law. He further submits that there is no material against the petitioner, in spite of that cognizance has been taken. According to him, in view of the last order, counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State and only omnibus allegation has been made in the counter affidavit and no specific all

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top