SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 795

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Amrit Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Amit Kumar Sinha, Advocate
For the Opposite Party : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P.

JUDGMENT :

Mr. Amit Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he will remove the defect, as pointed out by the office, within one week.

2. Let him to do so.

3. Heard Mr. Amit Kumar Sinha, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs. Vandana Bharti, learned A.P.P. appearing for the State.

4. This petition has been heard through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been heard.

5. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed for quashing of the order dated 30.01.2021, by which, process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. has been directed to be issued against the petitioner, in connection with Daltonganj Town P.S. Case No. 410 of 2019, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamau.

6. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was availing the remedy under the Cr.P.C. and he had filed the A.B.A. before this Court, which was dismissed as withdrawn, in view of the order passed by the learned Magist

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top